Tourism News

Tourism News Phuketwan Tourism News
facebook recommendations


Sign up now for our News Alert emails and the latest breaking news plus new features.

Click to subscribe

Existing subscribers can unsubscribe here


Alan Morison and Chutima Sidasathian: ''past the stage of being scared''

UPDATE Phuket Defamation Case: Journalists Mystified By Navy Stance

Sunday, December 22, 2013
UPDATING All Day, Every Day Thai navy sues Phuketwan journalists over Rohingya trafficking report

Original Report

BANGKOK: Alan Morison never expected to be on the wrong side of the Royal Thai Navy. Having worked as a journalist in Phuket for nearly a decade, his professional rapport with them was always amicable.

''We've always presumed that we have a good relationship with the Royal Thai Navy because we're both based in Phuket. And we hold them in high regard here with the things they do, from rescue to protection, '' Morison, the editor of the Phuketwan online news outlet, said.

So for Morison, it was a '''total mystery''' when a policeman called him last Monday to say he was coming to serve him with papers for a criminal defamation suit.

The policeman didn't say then who filed the suit, but on Tuesday Morison and his fellow Phuketwan journalist Chutima Sidasathian are due to reappear at the station for further investigation.

'''We started drawing up a list of 100 names who might be behind the action when we got the call, and the Royal Thai Navy wasn't anywhere on the list,'' he said.

The papers were served shortly after the call. When Morison found out the navy was not only filing for defamation - but also invoking the Computer Crimes Act, alleging a breach of the law - for an article he co-reported with Chutima, ''it was a puzzle to us.''

The navy responded to an article published online on July 17 by Morison and Chutima that focused on a Reuters investigation published the same month. It alleged a connection between the navy and the smuggling of Rohingya people. And the catalyst that set the navy off? Forty-two words quoted by Phuketwan from the Reuters piece.

'''The navy's action over one paragraph has become a perfect storm because it involves the very tragic treatment of the Rohingya and the application of a very harsh and onerous law on a small news organisation,''' Morison said.

''In taking action the way it has, the navy has brought its own reputation under closer examination than it would ever have wanted.'''

Human Rights Watch (HRW) confirmed the navy filed the case with the Vichit police station in Phuket, which issued a summons for Morison and Chutima.

Last Wednesday, Morison and Chutima reported to the police. They denied all charges and were fingerprinted.

A Reuters spokesperson said in an emailed statement on Friday: '''Our story was fair and balanced and Reuters has not been accused of criminal libel'''.

Morison and Chutima have talked on a few recent occasions with the journalists from Reuters. '''But we haven't talked to them for a couple of days,''' Morison said.

He said that based on the short statement released by Reuters: '''I guess that's how much they want to be involved at this stage''.

Phil Robertson, the deputy director for HRW's Asia Division, said the fact that reporters are not based in Bangkok would require a different legal procedure if the Royal Thai Navy was to bring a suit against Reuters.

The criminal complaint would have to be filed at Vichit police station and the station would then have to direct the case file to the Department of Justice in Bangkok to take further action.

''It will be interesting to see whether the navy has the political guts to go after the big boys,'' Mr Robertson said. ''It's very easy to pick on a small website in Phuket.''

Morison, mystified as to why Phuketwan has become a recent target of the navy, is outraged at the situation.

'''If the navy would spend as much time talking to the authorities [in Myanmar] about the mistreatment of the Rohingya as they spend reading Phuketwan, the world might be a better place,'' he said.

He does not understand why the suit has come months after the publication of the article - nor why the navy's focus is on alleged repeat defamation from a piece published by Reuters.

'''We think this is more about the navy's lack of understanding of the world outside the navy than anything else,''' Morison said.

'''We think the navy unfortunately does not have a real understanding of the way the media works and their influence on the human rights of the Rohingya people.

''What we're led to understand is that the navy no longer has a role to play in the shipments of Rohingya boatloads in the camps down in southern Thailand.'''

If convicted on the criminal defamation charges, Morison and Chutima could be imprisoned for up to two years. Under the Computer Crime Act, they face a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a fine of up to 100,000 baht, according to Human Rights Watch.

But Morison and Chutima are ''past the stage of being scared''.

Morison said: ''Chutima once went up a hillside to discover a camp for Rohingya in southern Thailand knowing there were armed guards around the perimeter of the camp, and that was scary.

''The thought of going to jail doesn't worry us as much as not knowing why the military has sued a small media organisation over one paragraph that comes from another source.''

Last Thursday evening, Chutima received a phone call from a go-between with contacts in the navy. That person asked whether Chutima and Morison would be prepared to accept a situation in which the navy would drop charges in lieu of a public apology.

''We told him that of course we would ... and we're awaiting news back from that go-between.'' Morison said. Now, for Morison and Chutima, the situation is a frustrating waiting game.

''At this stage we're awaiting some sort of formal word back from the navy,'' Morison said. ''We'll decide when we get that how to react.

''We're not likely to pursue action of any kind in the court because we don't think that's the right thing to do. Our advice to the navy, had they made a telephone call to us, would have been to settle any dispute by any other means,'' he said.

Reprinted from Bangkok Post December 22, 2013.


Comments have been disabled for this article.



We ardently request to all journalists and civil societies worldwide to stand by Morison and Chutima to be dropped from defamation case filed by Royal Thai navy.We would also like to ask help form respectable journalists and civil societies of the world to continue voice out humanitarian crisis of Rohingya boat people and genocide and ethnic cleansing in their homeland. We do hope that hidden human trafficking along the side of Thailand and Malaysia borders and continue genocide against Rohingya in Arakan is an international concern. We wish everybody's help !

Posted by Maung Kyaw Nu,President,Burmese Rohingya Association in Thailand (BRAT) on December 22, 2013 16:09


I hope that PW will not hesitate to reach out to international journalism associations (e.g. Reporters Without Borders etc.) for assistance in what could be a protracted messy dispute. I have my differences with PW, bit on this subject PW was one of the few if only media organizations in Thailand to offer specific factual information free of bias against muslims and refugees. I suggest that the PW reporting may very well have saved some lives and upheld some very fundamental basic human rights.I hope that the RTN reconsiders its position in this matter as it may cause embarrassment for Thailand.

Posted by Ryan on December 23, 2013 20:04

Editor Comment:

There is no doubt that the work of Phuketwan journalists with the South China Morning Post saved lives in 2009. Sadly, Burma still carries out the ethnic cleansing that puts the Rohingya in peril and causes problems for Thailand as a transit country. Inevitably, the secret human trafficking involves payment, torture and death. Putting journalists in jail will not make the tragedy go away.

Thursday May 30, 2024
Horizon Karon Beach Resort & Spa


Facebook Twitter