>
|
Breaking News
NEWS ALERTSSign up now for our News Alert emails and the latest breaking news plus new features. Existing subscribers can unsubscribe here |
CommentsAdd your comment using the form below. Want an avatar for your comments? Register with Gravatar. 500,000 cameras.... LOL.. Duh... Let us give every inbound tourist a mobile phone that calls directly to Khun Phrompong to ensure that the police will come. Posted by john s on February 19, 2012 11:04 I can see the ads now: "Enjoy your holiday in paradise while a half million security cameras watch your every move - for your own safety of course, because we care about our tourists!" Posted by Relox on February 19, 2012 11:05 Is someones family in the video camera supply trade ?? Posted by LivinLOS on February 19, 2012 11:37 Let's not have a repeat of what happened last time security cameras were installed in Patong. Huge budget to buy and install the cameras, zero budget to maintain them. Posted by Soupdragon on February 19, 2012 11:38 Without proper monitoring or a vigilant police force, it's all a waste.... And I have no doubt that it would be a waste. Posted by Dan on February 19, 2012 12:45 Quality digital cameras are needed on strategic locations! Not cheap B&W cameras where faces can not even be recognized! Posted by Mr. K on February 19, 2012 15:22 George Orwell "eat your heart out!". Even you could not have envisaged this scale of Big Brother is Watching You! But of course it won't happen, unless to line deep pockets. Imagine the cost & the potential for rip offs on the scale suggested. You would need several custom built centres to monitor such numbers of cameras & the manpower levels for 24 hour surveillance would be unsustainable. It's a real 'pie in the sky' politican posturing suggestion. Posted by Logic on February 19, 2012 16:18 Correct me if I am wrong, but don't they already have cameras monitoring most of Patong Beach, and isn't that exactly where most of the problems occur? It hasn't seemed to be very effective so far? Posted by jesse on February 19, 2012 16:23 (moderated) Posted by Mister Ree on February 19, 2012 20:05 Editor Comment: The comments facility is provided for readers who are interested in improving Phuket and the Andaman, and who have constructive ideas. Time and again we've proved our capacity to get to the truth. If you doubt the veracity of our articles, feel free to visit other sites . . . and stay there. I don't think Locals or tourists have a choice, in fact if we are not going to do anything wrong, why should we object. Posted by Gregg Cornell on February 19, 2012 23:47 Editor Comment: Er, because the cost of setting up and maintaining 500,000 cameras would provide a lot of hospitals and schools, and it wouldn't help as much as 500 or 1000 additional police officers. I think a more visible police force would achieve a better result. Posted by chaseone on February 20, 2012 07:57 (moderated) Posted by LivinLOS on February 20, 2012 08:29 Editor Comment: LivinLOS, what you choose to believe is entirely your own affair. The comment space is for additional information or constructive ideas. If you don't have any ideas, don't bother us. Having proved our accuracy time and time again, we no longer fuss about carping readers. Take it in . . . or let it out elsewhere. All the cameras in the world aren't going to fix anything ! For less money, you need to train & put more boots on the ground 24/7 in highrisk / tourist areas that not only are able to respond, but are a visible deterrent. As this ongoing problem seems to centre around tourists, there should be serious considerartion where you have some expats who live in Thailand also involved / consult. Posted by Anonymous on February 20, 2012 09:42 I have tried to get an opinion across on 2 occasions, failing both times. Posted by Steve C. on February 20, 2012 09:56 Editor Comment: Steve C., to condemn all locals for the behavior of a few is wrong-headed. You left out the four letter F-word, Fear, which is why in some cases honest responses can be poor. To blame all Thais or all locals for the attitudes of a few is unfair. The core issue has little to do with foreigners. Attitudes won't change until Fear is obliterated. 500,000 cameras, mm, seems like another figure a person in authority has pulling out of their arsenal, to justify or improve their own position or status, even if true, ha ha, I, as a communications/security technician of 40 years, would like to see the infrastructure to handle that number of cameras, it would be huge, along with support staff and staff to monitor them. Posted by Laurie Howells on February 20, 2012 10:19 Editor Comment: Posted by davidj949 on February 20, 2012 11:57 Editor Comment: You must have missed it, David, but I'll post it again just for you. It's displayed prominently on the front page: (moderated) Posted by LivinLOS on February 20, 2012 12:40 Editor Comment: PHUKETWAN hereby alters its policy on the posting of Comments and bans whingers, whiners, do-nothings, dingbats, doomsayers, carpers, harpers and kooks. This list may grow with time. Constructive ideas and new pieces of information remain welcome. Ed, you are correct. Fear is a major factor and definitely the reason why I have not pursued my case despite the video evidence. Even my own Embassy staff advised me against it. Posted by Steve C. on February 20, 2012 17:49 Editor Comment: Your posts are too long, Steve C. Apologies, but the concept is for short responses, not essays that are far longer than the original article. No point either in libelling individuals. I've seen some long posts published before so I though it was ok. Point taken. Posted by Steve C. on February 20, 2012 18:36 Editor Comment: Steve C., One of things we set out to do when we started Comments was to demolish some of the chat-room myth-making that was then patently obvious, paranoiac and highly damaging, and to make sure that readers were better informed. With the exception of ''murders'' and cases of ''strangling'' that are in any other part of the word suicide by hanging, I think we've largely achieved that aim. Without a balanced perspective that gives fair emphasis to the positive, too many of the problems of Phuket are blamed on Thais who have nothing to do with generating or profiting from those problems. I would urge you to make a similar distinction in everything you write. Doomsaying about Asean is not especially helpful. Providing a potential solution or two might be. This has got to be a joke. Or a misprint. Or they've gone completely mad. Or, unbelievably, it's collusion between local authorities and business. Posted by Alex on February 28, 2012 06:36 Editor Comment: The camera plan, as the story says, covers Phuket, Phang Nga and Krabi, not just Phuket. (moderated) Posted by A on February 28, 2012 10:07 Editor Comment: PHUKETWAN hereby alters its policy on the posting of Comments and bans whingers, whiners, do-nothings, dingbats, doomsayers, carpers, harpers and kooks. This list may grow with time. Constructive ideas and new pieces of information remain welcome. (moderated) Posted by Alex on February 28, 2012 12:41 Editor Comment: You are being censored (a) because you are repeatedly commenting on this thread using different sign-offs and (b) our policy has changed so that we no longer put up with harpers and carpers. After years of giving critics excessive airplay and time in response, we now offer complainants and critics two choices: accept what you read, or take your eyes elsewhere. Constructive suggesting a repeat for the experiment: Posted by Alex on February 28, 2012 12:50 Editor Comment: How many messages is that on this topic, Alex? Do you enjoy wasting other readers' time, and mine? Move on, we all have already. |
Wednesday May 23, 2012
MOST VIEWED
MOST COMMENT
|
You could put as many cameras as you want, but unless you put quality cameras, you wouldn't be able to see anything.
I have seen the cameras they have used in Phuket and the picture quality is like a pirated video tape of ET back in the 80's.
Posted by Tbs on February 19, 2012 11:04