Tourism News

Tourism News Phuketwan Tourism News
facebook recommendations

NEWS ALERTS

Sign up now for our News Alert emails and the latest breaking news plus new features.

Click to subscribe

Existing subscribers can unsubscribe here

RSS FEEDS

Time for a Phuket tax on sales or services?

Tax the Tourists, Bangkok Advisor Tells Phuket

Monday, August 11, 2008
Readers' comments below

A NATIONAL Government economics expert has suggested that Phuket should impose a special tax on tourists to gain the money to fund essential infrastructure.

Among the items the island needs but cannot afford is a fast-rail service from the airport, the Governor revealed.

The suggestion of a tax on tourists came from Dr Pisit Leeahtam, the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Ministry's Committee on Macroeconomics.

He held talks on August 11 with the Governor, the Tourism Authority of Thailand and business organisations while on a visit to Phuket to determine how best to solve the province's chronic inability to keep pace with development.

He said that rather than wait for the budget for growth from the national government, which had other financial priorities, Phuket should act to generate its own income.

A tax of one or two percent could be imposed on retail activities. Taxing the tourists was another alternative, he said.

''The tourists who come to Phuket have enough money to pay a tax,'' Dr Pisit told the Governor, Niran Kalayanamit, and the other officials at the meeting at the Provincial Administration conference meeting room.

More wealthy visitors were coming in greater numbers and Phuket needed good infrastructure and security, he said.

Look for an in-depth interview with Dr Pisit Leeartam coming on Phuketwan on August 13


The Governor said Phuket's problems were long-standing. The current annual budget of 150 million baht from the national government was not enough, he said.

Khun Niran added that he would like a fast-rail service to operate from the airport to Phuket City but the cost was too great.

Phuket was not given enough by Bangkok to proceed with that essential project, he said.

The Chairman of Business Tourism of Phuket, Phurit Maswongsa, told the meeting that Phuket did not have a realistic income based on the annual total of five million tourists, or the thousands of workers who came from other provinces to find jobs in tourism.

Phuket's income was based on just 320,000 registered citizens when the actual population of Thais alone was at least twice that number.

No allowance at all was made for the visiting tourists, who conrtibuted a huge amount to Thailand's national GDP.

He estimated that in any month during the high season, Phuket's population was more than a million people, yet the budget was for just one third that number.

Other sources have said that Phuket also supports an extra 100,000 legal and illegal migrant laborers, mostly from Burma.

The TAT says Phuket and tourism delivered 90 billion baht to Thailand's national coffers in 2007 alone.

What's your view on a tax on tourists to build a fast-rail service to the airport? Tell us now by commenting below. It's easy!

Related Articles:

Funding for tourism in Thailand is more about take than give, a promising new Andaman destination discovers.

Budget Cuts Hurt New Andaman Destination

Why Phuket's Record High Season Is a Disaster

Comments

Comments have been disabled for this article.

gravatar

Why not a tax on plastic bags? Now that would save Phuket's marine life at the same time as it gave property developers the help they need to turn the island into a suburb of Sydney or Southampton.

Posted by Angelfire on August 11, 2008 23:12

gravatar

A fast-rail service is just what Phuket needs. Tax the people who need it and will use it, the tourists. Why should the locals pay for it? Tax the people who come to enjoy Phuket's beautiful natural assets but pay nothing for the privilege.

Posted by Angelfire on August 11, 2008 23:23

gravatar

A fast rail service is a good idea, but why to Phuket City? Surely the ideal destination would be Patong? Oh sorry - I forgot that the taxi mafia will not allow this. That's the real reason why Phuket City will be the destination.

Posted by Simon Luttrell on August 12, 2008 06:47

gravatar

I guess this means that every time I go buy something I'll have to carry my passport around to show that I'm NOT a tourist; or perhaps it will be the same policy as the national parks, where, if you are farang you pay 10 times more even if you live, work and pay taxes here.

Smells of another double-pricing scheme with racist overtones to me.

Posted by Roberta on August 12, 2008 09:54


Monday December 23, 2024
Horizon Karon Beach Resort & Spa

FOLLOW PHUKETWAN

Facebook Twitter