PHUKET: Veteran Australian journalist Alan Morison and his Thai colleague Chutima Sidasathian have been acquitted on charges of defaming the Royal Thai Navy in a case that will have far-reaching consequences for the media in military-run Thailand.
Morison, 67, said the ruling delivered to a packed court on the Thai resort island of Phuket "sends a clear message from Thailand's judicial system that Thailand's media should be free".
"We hope it is sign of Thailand's growing maturity and that the media and military can live side by side," he said.
Morison and Chutima, 34, had faced up to seven years' jail on unprecedented charges brought by the Thai navy.
Chutima collapsed into the arms of her mother when a judge announced the verdict.
Two judges ruled that Morison and Chutima had no intention to damage Thailand's reputation in the story they published in 2013 on Phuketwan, a small online news website.
They said the information they published came from Reuters, a reliable news organisation, and was not their own.
Morison, a former senior editor of The Age, has been spending his life's savings publishing Phuketwan, which has led coverage of the plight of Rohingyas from Myanmar who have been described by the United Nations as among the world's most persecuted people.
Mark Plunkett, a Brisbane barrister who observed the trial for Australia's MEAA union, said the court is to be congratulated for arriving at a just result on the merits of the case.
"However, Thailand's defamation and Computer Crime Act laws must be repealed as they constitute a hideous threat to freedom of speech and democracy in Thailand," he said.
The controversial trial came amid dramatic revelations of a grim people smuggling trade across South-east Asia where people were abandoned at sea and in jungle death camps by traffickers.
Images of starving and distressed Rohingyas on boats in the region's waters shocked the world, prompting a Thai crackdown and eventually forcing South-east Asian governments to act together to end the trade.
More than 100 people were arrested, including senior Thai officials.
The charges related to a single paragraph re-published in Phuketwan from a Reuters report that subsequently won a Pulitzer prize, the world's top journalism award.
But the Royal Thai Navy only laid charges over the Phuketwan re-publication, prompting criticism that it had singled out a small independent news outlet.
Chutima had worked as a paid fixer for Reuters on its Rohingya coverage and introduced Reuters reporters to news sources.
Reuters, one of the world's largest media and information companies, distanced itself from the case.
Prosecution witnesses gave no explanation in court as to why only Phuketwan was charged.
Defence lawyers argued in court that the Reuters paragraph quoting a people smuggler saying "Thai naval forces" sometimes earned money or turned a blind eye to Rohingya boats did not name the Royal Thai Navy and that there were multiple naval forces in Thailand, including the coastguard and police.
That argument went uncontested in court.
In the indictment the words "Thai naval forces" was erroneously translated into "Royal Thai Navy", the court was told.
Defence lawyers also questioned whether a branch of the armed forces could sue for defamation when no individuals were identified as being aggrieved by the story.
They also argued the Computer Crimes Act should not be applied in defamation cases.
Morison and Chutima earlier this year sent a letter to Thai authorities expressing "deep regret" at what had transpired but insisted an apology was not warranted.
"We had no intention of apologising for something that we haven't done," Morison said. "This was a matter of important principle. This case was wrong from the beginning, with one or two officers acting on bad advice."
Morison could have left Thailand to avoid the trial but said he had stayed to fight the case with Chutima in the interests of media freedom.
After the verdict, Morison said he would consider the future of Phuketwan in the coming days. "Fighting the case has been a huge financial and personal burden," he said.
Phil Robertson, the deputy director of Human Rights Watch's Asia division, said: "This whole episode shows a fundamental lack of understanding among Thai government and military officials about what a free press is really about and the role it plays in democratic society.
"Thailand needs to revoke both its criminal defamation statute and the Computer Crimes Act to end this assault on media freedom."
Kingsley Abbott, from the International Commission of Jurists, said while the acquittals are very welcome, "Thailand must now move to abolish criminal defamation, which is an abuse of freedom of expression and is out of line with its international legal obligations".
Morison, 67, said the ruling delivered to a packed court on the Thai resort island of Phuket "sends a clear message from Thailand's judicial system that Thailand's media should be free".
"We hope it is sign of Thailand's growing maturity and that the media and military can live side by side," he said.
Morison and Chutima, 34, had faced up to seven years' jail on unprecedented charges brought by the Thai navy.
Chutima collapsed into the arms of her mother when a judge announced the verdict.
Two judges ruled that Morison and Chutima had no intention to damage Thailand's reputation in the story they published in 2013 on Phuketwan, a small online news website.
They said the information they published came from Reuters, a reliable news organisation, and was not their own.
Morison, a former senior editor of The Age, has been spending his life's savings publishing Phuketwan, which has led coverage of the plight of Rohingyas from Myanmar who have been described by the United Nations as among the world's most persecuted people.
Mark Plunkett, a Brisbane barrister who observed the trial for Australia's MEAA union, said the court is to be congratulated for arriving at a just result on the merits of the case.
"However, Thailand's defamation and Computer Crime Act laws must be repealed as they constitute a hideous threat to freedom of speech and democracy in Thailand," he said.
The controversial trial came amid dramatic revelations of a grim people smuggling trade across South-east Asia where people were abandoned at sea and in jungle death camps by traffickers.
Images of starving and distressed Rohingyas on boats in the region's waters shocked the world, prompting a Thai crackdown and eventually forcing South-east Asian governments to act together to end the trade.
More than 100 people were arrested, including senior Thai officials.
The charges related to a single paragraph re-published in Phuketwan from a Reuters report that subsequently won a Pulitzer prize, the world's top journalism award.
But the Royal Thai Navy only laid charges over the Phuketwan re-publication, prompting criticism that it had singled out a small independent news outlet.
Chutima had worked as a paid fixer for Reuters on its Rohingya coverage and introduced Reuters reporters to news sources.
Reuters, one of the world's largest media and information companies, distanced itself from the case.
Prosecution witnesses gave no explanation in court as to why only Phuketwan was charged.
Defence lawyers argued in court that the Reuters paragraph quoting a people smuggler saying "Thai naval forces" sometimes earned money or turned a blind eye to Rohingya boats did not name the Royal Thai Navy and that there were multiple naval forces in Thailand, including the coastguard and police.
That argument went uncontested in court.
In the indictment the words "Thai naval forces" was erroneously translated into "Royal Thai Navy", the court was told.
Defence lawyers also questioned whether a branch of the armed forces could sue for defamation when no individuals were identified as being aggrieved by the story.
They also argued the Computer Crimes Act should not be applied in defamation cases.
Morison and Chutima earlier this year sent a letter to Thai authorities expressing "deep regret" at what had transpired but insisted an apology was not warranted.
"We had no intention of apologising for something that we haven't done," Morison said. "This was a matter of important principle. This case was wrong from the beginning, with one or two officers acting on bad advice."
Morison could have left Thailand to avoid the trial but said he had stayed to fight the case with Chutima in the interests of media freedom.
After the verdict, Morison said he would consider the future of Phuketwan in the coming days. "Fighting the case has been a huge financial and personal burden," he said.
Phil Robertson, the deputy director of Human Rights Watch's Asia division, said: "This whole episode shows a fundamental lack of understanding among Thai government and military officials about what a free press is really about and the role it plays in democratic society.
"Thailand needs to revoke both its criminal defamation statute and the Computer Crimes Act to end this assault on media freedom."
Kingsley Abbott, from the International Commission of Jurists, said while the acquittals are very welcome, "Thailand must now move to abolish criminal defamation, which is an abuse of freedom of expression and is out of line with its international legal obligations".
Great news indeed!!!
Let's hope they will not file an appeal - it probably will be known during first 10 days of October.
It would be really great if full text of verdict is published here, to see full argumentation of the (courageous, yes) judges, and that may help other people in similar situations to use that argumentation.
P.S. My understanding was that recently finally criminal charges were brought against Reuters? If so,let's them go through all this,especially as they put that PW 41-words paragraph was not original their text,let's they spend some resources on defending their case, and,please, without reference to PW trial outcome.
Posted by Sue on September 1, 2015 15:33
Editor Comment:
We believe no charges are likely to be laid against Reuters.