Tourism News

Tourism News Phuketwan Tourism News
facebook recommendations


Sign up now for our News Alert emails and the latest breaking news plus new features.

Click to subscribe

Existing subscribers can unsubscribe here


Now missing: Homework in a Patong restaurant for Ricardo

Phuket Tug-of-Love Boy Not Seen at Border Crossing

Thursday, February 24, 2011
CONCERNS are held for the safety of an abducted Phuket boy after his foster mother was reported to have crossed from Thailand to Malaysia without him.

Immigration officials have told Phuketwan that Kimberley Ching-Yong is recorded as having crossed the border at Sungai Kolok in Narathiwat province in a vehicle on February 19, with no sign of the boy.

Tug-of-love boy Ricardo Chain Pol Choosaneh, who recently celebrated his ninth birthday, was due to start at Phuket's British International School this week.

But Kimberley Ching-Yong, supplied with documentation for the boy by local Dutch officials, stole him from his natural mother and disappeared.

Ms Ching-Yong's trip from Europe to Phuket to help celebrate Ricardo's ninth birthday had been paid for by the boy's Patong-based Thai family.

Ms Ching-Yong raised Ricardo from the age of nine months until May last year, when the boy's mother Sumetha Choosaneh abducted her son from the care of his father, Michael Roland van Alphen, in the Dutch city of Delft, fleeing back to Phuket via France.

Sumetha Choosaneh says she was not represented at a Dutch hearing where the court awarded custody to his father, and that while working in France to support her son, she was consistently denied access and not even allowed to talk to him.

After the previous report on the boy's case, Phuketwan received correspondence from Ricardo's great aunt, Prangtip Sakornsin.

Having spoken to both the boy's mother and Thai family and to his foster mother at different times, at no stage has Phuketwan taken sides in this double-abduction. Deep emotions are clearly felt by his mother, and by the woman who raised him.

In the interests of the boy's whereabouts becoming known as soon as possible, Phuketwan now draws the attention of authorities in the Netherlands to Khun Prangtip's correspondence:

''I would like to begin by thanking you for printing our story in Phuket Wan; we appreciate your support, however there was a misunderstanding concerning the legal status of Kimberley Ching-Yong (Kimberley). You reported that Kimberley was the stepmother to Ricardo Chain Pon [also Pol] Choosaneh (Ricardo), but this is not now, nor was it ever true that Kimberley is or was Ricardo's stepmother. Kimberley is not now, nor was she ever married to Ricardo's natural father, Michael Roland van Alphen (Michael). Michael and Kimberley (who is 10 years his senior) have never been married, nor have they ever lived together as husband and wife, therefore Kimberley can never claim to be Ricardo's stepmother. Legally, Kimberley has never been more than a ''caregiver'' or ''nanny'' to Ricardo. It is our understanding that Michael, knowing he was unable to care for Ricardo, requested that Kimberley care for the child; Michael took this action without informing Ricardo's mother Sumetha Choosaneh (Sumetha), which was contrary to the agreement made between Ricardo's parents Michael and Sumetha. They agreed that Michael would care for Ricardo while Sumetha went to work in France, and that if Michael was unable to care for their son, he would return Ricardo to Sumetha.

Unfortunately, on the day that the story was printed, Ricardo was abducted by Kimberley from Sumetha and Ricardo's home in Phuket, leaving all Ricardo's clothes and belongings behind. We believe she has taken Ricardo to the Dutch Embassy in either Phuket or Bangkok where she will request the necessary documents to remove Ricardo, a citizen of Thailand, from his family and home country. We do not understand on what basis the Dutch Embassy would grant such documents to Kimberley, unless Kimberley has produced documentation from the Netherlands indicating custody of Ricardo; if this is the case we would question the basis upon which Kimberley's documentation was obtained considering Ricardo's mother Sumetha was not consulted on Michael's decision to allow Kimberley to care for Ricardo.

It is obvious to anyone familiar with the story of Ricardo's life that Kimberley has acted in her own self-interests and without concern for Ricardo's future and well-being. Ricardo, upon his reunion with his mother Sumetha and his family in Thailand, was embarking on a bright and healthy future with many opportunities. He was living in a vibrant and secure island paradise, surrounded by a large, loving family and many new friends his own age. In addition, Ricardo was recently accepted by the British International School located in Phuket, which is one of the world's finest private schools; Ricardo is scheduled to begin classes on Monday, February 21. Kimberley witnessed Ricardo's happiness in being reunited with his family; she witnessed his new healthy and safe surroundings and knows how excited he is to begin classes at the British International School; however, without considering what is best for Ricardo, she has abducted him and is determined to return with him to her flat in the Netherlands.

If Kimberley manages to return with Ricardo to the Netherlands his life will be absent of the love of his mother and a large loving family, and the advantage of a superior education. We learned that Ricardo's life with Kimberley in the Netherlands was absent of family and friends, with only an occasional annual visit with his father Michael, and Michael's parents. Ricardo tells us that every day he would come home from school to an empty flat where he would await Kimberley's return from work. We understand from Ricardo that his greatest pleasure was sleeping with Kimberley every night. The fact that a nine year old boy sleeps with a 50-year old unmarried woman every night causes us great concern; we believe this is most unacceptable and severely damaging to Ricardo's psychological and emotional well-being, and have seen evidence as such.

Kimberley's abduction and intimate attachment to our child Ricardo is very disturbing. Kimberley has needs and desires; we realise that she is not well, being very lonely and living a life with no engaging prospects, and we also understand that Kimberley relies on the monthly National Child Benefit Payments she may share with Michael. However what is most important here is not the needs and desires of others, but only Ricardo's future and well-being, and it is this that his family in Phuket will eventually secure through the legal process. It is our hope to have Ricardo returned to Phuket so that he may begin classes at the British International School as scheduled.

Prangtip Sakornsin''

Khun Prangtip also forwarded a letter she wrote to a Dutch journalist:

Here is the story of Ricardo from my perspective...

Ricardo's mother Sumetha is my niece; she is one of my sister's daughters. Our family maintains very close relationships and therefore Sumetha and I have been part of each other's lives since she was an infant.

Concerning my niece's relationship with Mike I recall, it was about nine years ago that Sumetha, six months pregnant at the time, came to Phuket with Mike (Ricardo's alleged "father"). They arrived in need of assistance, in need of a place to live and a job for Mike. At that time our family was involved in several business ventures that included the development and management of a resort property, restaurants and residential housing; these ventures were being managed by my brother, my husband and me.

To give Sumetha and Mike a place to live was easily accomplished, but finding a job for Mike was a challenge because all of our businesses had been established for some time and had experienced management personnel in place; there were no job positions readily available. However, due to the situation, we offered Mike a good salary plus profit-sharing as his compensation to manage the Pan Yaah restaurant, which we had opened a year earlier. It was actually my idea that Mike would manage the restaurant and raise the level of service up to the standards of the western countries. This was our goal because, although the restaurant was at that time and continues to be very popular, most of our clientele were tourists from all over the world (mostly from America and Western Europe) that had come to enjoy the beauty of Phuket and we wanted to serve them in a manner to which they were accustomed.

Mike's work schedule was very flexible and allowed him time to enjoy a very good lifestyle. During the day he would spend his time either playing golf (we had given him admittance to the Phuket Country Club) or sunbathing around one of our property's pools. At around six o'clock he would go to the Pan Yaah restaurant and have something to eat before beginning his management duties.

In the beginning it appeared like the arrangement was working well, he had thought of a couple of good ideas about how we could improve the restaurant's current service level and also ideas of how we could offer new and distinctive services to our customers. We respected him as the manager and allowed him the ability to make the day-to-day management decisions without our direct supervision, or interference.

After a couple of months on the job it became apparent that none of his ideas had been implemented and he was not conducting his daily duties as manager. Upon closer inspection we learned that Mike had been sitting at the restaurant's bar every night after dinner where he would order one drink after another until closing time. I discussed this behavior with him on several occasions, reminding him of his duties as manager and the negative impact this behavior was having on staff morale, and more importantly, how that will affect our service level which will cause the business to suffer; he seemed not to care and continued his nightly drinking at the bar.

Finally, with the situation getting more and more serious, I had to tell him that his behavior and attitude was quite unacceptable, and therefore we decided that he would be removed from his position as manager of the Pan Yaah restaurant. This decision did not affect our support of my niece and Mike; we continued to provide their room and board.

It was shortly after this incident and about one month before Ricardo was born, that my niece came to me to tell me that Mike would like to go back to Holland by himself and then she asked if I would give her the money to buy Mike's plane ticket and additional funds for her to give to him to support him until he finds work in Holland. This discussion prompted me to speak to Mike about his plans for the unborn child. At that time Mike told me that he is not even sure that the child is his and that if he were called upon to support the child he would request a DNA test to prove the claim that he was the child's father. It was with this in mind that he resisted placing his surname on Ricardo's certificate of birth.

Initially, I held back the financial support that would allow him to go back to Holland, hoping that the situation would change for the better, even hoping that Mike might change his attitude when the child was born, and possibly falling in love when he actually sees and holds the child. And yes, after Ricardo was born Mike's attitude did soften a little, and he may have even believed Ricardo was his child; however Mike was still determined to return to Holland alone and again failed to offer Sumetha the use of his last name for Ricardo's listing in the Thai House Registration of Birth.

At this point in time we were all very uncomfortable with the situation so we decided to give Mike the financial support that would allow him to go back to Holland. We gave him about 200,000 Thai baht to pay for the plane ticket and to support him until he found work, just as my niece had requested. I believe that what happened next is revealing of Mike's character: the day after we gave the money to Mike, the Thai Bank (the bank that Mike had went to convert the Baht to Guilders before leaving Thailand) called to request that we reimburse the bank for the converted Guilders that Mike had withdrawn because he, at the same time, withdrew the Baht from which the Guilders were to be converted. The Thai Bank said they had the security video recording that shows how Mike made the transactions simultaneously and ended up with both the Baht and the Guilders. Our legal counsel advised us to deny the bank's request to reimburse the funds. The bank had told us that if we did not reimburse the funds on Mike's behalf, they would file the appropriate reports and Mike would be blacklisted by the Immigration Bureau, which may explain Mike's reluctance to return to Thailand.

Shortly thereafter, Ricardo was born and our family continued to support and care for Sumetha and of course, her infant son Ricardo. Naturally at this time, Sumetha, still being in love with Mike, missed him and wished that she and Ricardo would be reunited with him and live as a traditional family. Sumetha and Mike had been corresponding with one another and Mike requested she and Ricardo come to Holland, and that he had a job waiting for her when she arrived. I suggested to Sumetha that she leave Ricardo with the family and go to Holland to rebuild her relationship with Mike and establish herself in her new job first, once that was accomplished she could then either come back to get Ricardo or we would bring him to her when she felt secure in her new life in Holland.

We were very concerned for her and the boy because he was an infant at the time and Sumetha had never lived in Holland before (she most recently lived and worked in France). Sumetha insisted that Mike had a job for her and she must bring Ricardo along so they can live together as a family. She asked if I could give her some money for her and Ricardo to travel to Holland, so I did.

After arriving in Holland, Sumetha's contact with the family became less and less frequent, until we rarely heard from her at all; it was about a year after she left that Sumetha called to tell us that the job in Holland was not steady enough to pay the bills and that she and Mike agreed that it would be easier for her to find a steady job in France, so she should go back to work in France and send him the money to pay the bills; since he had never found a job he would be able to stay at home and take care of Ricardo. And so it was done, Mike convinced Sumetha to return to France and work to support her new family, while he stayed in Holland and played ''daddy,'' or so it seemed.

We came to learn that although Sumetha had been sending money to Mike as they agreed (and she has proof of this), Mike had been corresponding with her less frequently and when they did make contact he was reluctant to have her speak to Ricardo. As it turned out, Mike had one new girlfriend after another; the first one was named Kimberly, followed by a second one, Debbie. In both instances Mike and his girlfriends applied for, and received child benefits from the Social Insurance Bank. It was now clear to Sumetha that Mike had tricked her into bringing Ricardo to Holland for the purpose of receiving welfare funds from the Dutch Government in the form of child benefits.

We know now that my niece was extremely distraught; many times she attempted to obtain legal counsel in France to regain custody of Ricardo by bringing the case to court in Holland; however being a single woman from another country made the process very difficult, and very expensive. Sumetha told us that she was very ashamed that she had been deceived by Mike and she was also ashamed of her decision not to take our advice, so much so, that she felt that she could not ask the family for financial assistance in this matter. During this time our family thought that she was fine and doing fairly well; we did not know that Mike had, at this point, legally abducted Ricardo and placed him with one girlfriend after another.

Sumetha had known one of these girlfriends, a Kimberly; Mike had been dating this Kimberly when he met Sumetha. When Sumetha learned that Mike had returned to Kimberly, taking Ricardo with him, she contacted Kimberly explaining to her that she, Sumetha, was Ricardo's mother. Sumetha told Kimberly about her relationship with Mike and how Mike had taken Ricardo from her and that she wanted her son returned as soon as possible. Kimberly was childless and did not want to give up her new ''son.''

Sumetha continued corresponding with Kimberly to get information about Ricardo's well-being. This went on for several years during which time Kimberly had been taking care of Ricardo and viewed him as her own son. Sumetha, however, was trying to impress upon Kimberly that she was Ricardo's biological mother, not Kimberly, and that Sumetha wanted very much to have Ricardo returned home.

During one of their conversations, Kimberly had told my niece that Mike had ''kidnapped'' Ricardo from school without telling her and gave Ricardo to his second girlfriend, Debbie, who was to take care of Ricardo, however soon after this Debbie had a child of her own, and according to Kimberly, Ricardo was being neglected. This information caused my niece great anguish concerning her son's future, and not knowing what else could be done (Kimberly resisted returning Ricardo to Sumetha), she reluctantly asked Kimberly for any assistance possible to secure the safety of Ricardo.

It was then that Kimberly filed documents with the Court to obtain legal custody of Ricardo, telling my niece that it would be temporary and in Ricardo's best interest because Mike will continue to abandon Ricardo with one girlfriend after another, possibly exposing Ricardo to great danger; it was this language that persuaded Sumetha to accept Kimberly's plan hoping that it would eventually lead to Ricardo's safe return home to her and the family.

The Court granted Kimberly's request, but initially only allowed Kimberly custody for a few days each month, on this point I am unclear. Eventually however, we learned that the Court had discovered that Mike was no longer cohabitating with his girlfriend Debbie (she had taken her daughter and moved out) and because Mike had no steady job and no visible means of support other than the child benefit payments, which were insufficient to pay the rent, it was only a matter of time before he and Ricardo would be homeless. We are told that it was because of this that the Court granted Kimberly full custody of Ricardo for one year, after which time the Court would reevaluate Mike's ability to care for Ricardo before determining if Mike could once again obtain some form of custody.

We were surprised that the Court would grant full custody to Kimberly, who was just a girlfriend of the ''acting'' father, and do so without the biological mother's consent. We suspect that when Mike had first taken Ricardo to Kimberly, they filed a petition to adopt Ricardo based on Mike's deceitful fabrication that Sumetha abandoned Ricardo. We are very interested to discover the basis upon which Mike proved to the Court that he was Ricardo's legitimate father.

It may seem to someone just learning of this situation that Sumetha and her family were not concerned with Ricardo's well-being until recently, but this is not true. For quite some time Sumetha attempted to resolve the situation on her own; Mike had been leading her on for years, telling her that they would eventually be together as a family. It is only recently that the family learned of her plight and it was decided to take action to recover our loved one Ricardo, and bring him home. We would ask the Court, how many mothers will Ricardo have if after one year the Court will allow Mike to have legal custody of the child?

Ricardo was born in Thailand, he is a citizen of Thailand and this is where his true family resides, a family that is extremely capable of caring for him and securing him a promising future. We do not want the child to grow up having a complicated and unsure future, we missed him dearly and we are so very happy to have him back home where he belongs.

Our family has been blessed with both good health and financial security; we are doing well enough to take care of both Sumetha and Ricardo. At this time Sumetha and her brother Pecko are partners in the popular Thai restaurant, the Thong Lor Cafe, that you may remember visiting during your stay in Phuket. As for Ricardo's future: we plan for him to graduate from the International High School in Thailand and then possibly continue his education at the university level in America.
Airport Alert for Phuket Boy Snatched by Dutch Stepmother in Abduction Wrangle
Breaking News The family of a nine year old Phuket boy today called for help in apprehending the boy and his stepmother before they are able to flee Thailand for Europe.
Airport Alert for Phuket Boy Snatched by Dutch Stepmother in Abduction Wrangle

Phuket Love-Tangle Boy Safe, Happy in Patong
Latest An international romance that went wrong has led to eight year old Ricardo being brought back to Phuket by his Thai mother without the permission of his Dutch father.
Phuket Love-Tangle Boy Safe, Happy in Patong

Phuket City Arrest: FBI Fly American Dad, Girl Home
Breaking News FBI agents have combined with Immigration officers to arrest an American father who is accused of kidnapping his daughter and fleeing with her to Phuket.
Phuket City Arrest: FBI Fly American Dad, Girl Home

Phuket Boy in 'Kidnap from Europe' Drama
Breaking News A Thai mother who was granted access to her boy in the Netherlands fled with him first to France then probably to Phuket, the boy's grieving step mother tells Phuketwan.
Phuket Boy in 'Kidnap from Europe' Drama


Comments have been disabled for this article.


This story is turning into as sad a story as the plight of the Rohinga people. Only difference is this little boy has an identity, if nothing else.

Posted by GrahamM on February 24, 2011 14:17


"Having spoken to both the boy's mother and Thai family and to his foster mother at different times, at no stage has Phuketwan taken sides in this double-abduction. Deep emotions are clearly felt by his mother, and by the woman who raised him."

That is simply not true. Your report of 18 February clearly and unequivocally supports the Thai version of events. As does your report of today where you repeat and add to the Thai family statement - obviously written by a third, native English speaking, party.

Why did you find the necessity to make such a comment in today's article? It reminds me of Shakespeare, King Lear I think: "The man doth protesteth too much".

Posted by A. Skeptic on February 24, 2011 17:22

Editor Comment:

Are you saying that deep emotions are NOT ''clearly felt by his mother, and by the woman who raised him?''

If so, you are sadly mistaken. You also seem to be bigotted to the point where you imagine that no Thai can write good English.

That's two big blunders, A. Skeptic.

We needed to make the point that we do not support either parent's case because a few readers with narrow, entrenched attitudes will continue to confuse a one-sided account - which this is - with bias on our part. They're quite different things.

Our first report on the case was also one-sided, from the foster-mother's perspective. However until recently, both parties were content to accept our impartiality. We would be delighted to have an explanation from Kimberley, especially if she could assure us that Ricardo is safe.

What a pity some readers are not as concerned as we are about the boy. You got one thing right, A. Skeptic: it is a family tragedy of Shakespearean proportions.


OK, now we have the one sided story from the Thai family has PW tired to contact Mike so that adjective and balanced journalism can be given to the reader?

Posted by Graham on February 24, 2011 18:15

Editor Comment:

The Thai family contacted us, just as Kimberley did before them. We are only too happy to carry other versions of the circumstances.


That's a fair answer. It would be very interesting to hear Mike's side of things and get a more rounded view.

Posted by Graham on February 24, 2011 19:20


Why is it "stolen" when referencing the step mother and merely "abducted" when referencing the Thai mother ??

It the writer even aware they are doing it ??

Posted by LivinLOS on February 24, 2011 19:23

Editor Comment:

Stolen, snatched, abducted, taken . . . we used the word ''kidnapped'' in the first account, which was probably taking it too far. A ''family abduction'' appears to be the accepted way of describing the mother's action in taking her boy from Delft. The foster mother's actions are less clearly defined, although Dutch officials in Thailand appear to think she has the same rights as the boy's mother and father, or at least the right to act on behalf of the father. Shouldn't your first concern be for the boy and both women, rather than petty point-scoring?

''It the writer even aware they are doing it ??'' Huh? You've lost it again, LivinLOS. Maybe you're on the wrong site.


Really heart wrenching stories.

First I hope nothing happened to Ricardo and he is safe and sound.

Ricardo's mother has a great family with big hearts, even when they can see, they support with love. (For me - that is a theme for me -, the anecdotal evidence shows clearly again, that giving money never is a solution, just prolong or more of the same problem, but that's just my opinion.)

After reading the one side, I really do not know, what positive outcome is possible for Ricardo. Maybe only a less bad one can be achieved. Seems like Ricardo's parents both like to leave their kid some place else, but finding people who deeply care for him. What a sad story.

But now I would like to take sides, I hope Ricardo can come back to Thailand.

One thing I do not understand is how the bank can be fooled like this. Take the Baht AND the Guilders? How can you know such a flaw? Tellingly funny if true.

Posted by Lena on February 24, 2011 20:32


"Are you saying that deep emotions are NOT 'clearly felt by his mother, and by the woman who raised him?''

No, I am not. I never mentioned once in my remarks any single thing about emotions. Don't use cheap tactics to try to demean me. You only demean yourself as any intelligent reader can see.

I am not bigoted in the least. Again, don't try to assume the moral high ground and deflect your mistakes by cheap tactics. I will bet you 1 million baht that the article produced by the family was written by a native English speaker. Either that or a member of the family was schooled in the UK - like our (unelected) Eton bred Prime Minister. Are you seriously suggesting that any Thai other than the outstandingly well educated, in an English speaking country can write so well - give me a break! The point I am making is that the spin doctors swung into action on behalf of this family.

It is to the credit of most Thais that they speak English well enough to converse with farangs. Most farangs, unlike me, don't bother, even though this is Thailand. By the way, you still owe me a magnum of champagne for your misreported "bling" article re Bangla Road.

"Our first report on the case was also one-sided, from the foster-mother's perspective."
Damn right it was. As was your statements that Ricardo was a latch-key kid (unsubstantiated).


Posted by A. Skeptic on February 25, 2011 00:00

Editor Comment:

You said the paragraph that mentioned the women's emotions was ''simply not true.'' And then, having proven your lack of understanding of the English language, you went on to make the point quite plainly that you can have bigoted perspectives, even if you are not a classic bigot. Now you say, ''well, there could be another answer . . . ''.

We not longer publish reader's ill-considered comments denigrating Phuketwan. There are forums opening up on Thai Visa all the time now for the confused and angry to ''debate'' the virtues of Phuket's media.


I wouldn't worry about LivinLOS Ed. He seems to spend his entire life inside forums instead of sticking his head out the window and takes pride in taking a contrary view. Mind you if i know he's in the differnt forums and online sites I must be as well!!!

Posted by Mister Ree on February 25, 2011 01:00

Editor Comment:

I don't worry about LivinLOS, Mr Ree. Being contrary is not a problem. But being contrary without thinking is.


The fact that phuketwan has published this crap without any evidence of fact is astonishing. If you want to be a news outlet supply truths, not an Aunties version of events that may or are most likely are not fully correct. (moderated). Andrew, just because it is Thai does not mean it is right!!

Posted by Jimmy on February 25, 2011 01:08

Editor Comment:

Don't you understand quote marks, Jimmy? Everything we put within quote marks is opinion, not fact. This particular viewpoint does not become ''fact'' simply because it has been published (except, perhaps, in the minds of readers who can't distinguish between fact and opinion.) But it does add to what is an important international debate about the future of a young boy, and we don't apologise for publishing it. The ''facts'' may never be clear. We are journalists, not judges. I can suggest several good colleges in the US and Britain that can teach you the difference.


I think this article and the writer is being as transparent as possible with obviously limited flow of information.

It seems apparent that there is no word from the Dutch side yet and that the Thai family is in agony other this case.

I would assume the Dutch family are not going to comment until they achieve their objectives.

Based on their statements the Thai family appears to be fairly well off and values education so it is very plausible that they can correspond with the media in well written English.

I know plenty of Thai people who speak English as well as me (and are a lot more polite as well).

Posted by Rob on February 25, 2011 09:32


To all those following the story of Ricardo, My name is Prangtip Sakornsin and I am the auntie referred to in one of the comments above. To set the record straight, I am a graduate of the Texas Woman's University in Denton, Texas, USA, and I drafted all the correspondence you have read in Phuket Wan. At this time I am living between the USA and Thailand as I have businesses in both countries, and although I speak fairly good English I do have an English educated business manager that researches and proofreads all of my correspondences.

I would also like to correct the Editor's comment that Kimberley "had raised Ricardo from the age of nine months until May last year." What we know is that Ricardo's parents Sumetha and Mike tried to raise Ricardo together as a family for the first couple of years. Ricardo was about two and one-half years old when Mike gave Ricardo to Kimberley. Ricardo was about five years old when Mike took Ricardo from school without telling Kimberley and gave Ricardo to another girlfriend, Debbie. Soon after this Mike and Debbie had a child of their own, and according to Kimberley, Ricardo was being neglected. This arrangement lasted about two years before Mike and Debbie broke up and Mike lost custody of their child to Debbie; moving out of Debbie's home, Mike gave Ricardo back to Kimberley for about one year until Ricardo was reunited with his Thai family. It appears that Kimberley cared for Ricardo for about four years.

As for Ricardo living as a latch-key child with Kimberley in Holland, this fact was revealed in general conversation by Ricardo himself and later confirmed in conversation by Kimberley. Also, it was Ricardo that revealed their sleeping arrangement, however Ricardo states that they slept together every night while Kimberley insists it is only about once a week that they sleep together. What we know now is that Ricardo is reluctant to sleep alone, which causes me great concern.

I would like to thank all those following the story of Ricardo.


Posted by Prangtip Sakornsin on February 25, 2011 13:12

Editor Comment:

The statement about Kimberley caring for Ricardo came from the first article on the case which reported - and which has not been denied until now: ''It's heart-breaking,'' she said by telephone from her home in Delft. ''I have been looking after Ricardo since he was nine months old, as though he was my own son. Now he has been taken away. We desperately want him back.''


Ricardo's Thai mother is living in Bangkok, and auntie Prangtip Sakornsin is living in the USA. Who was taking care of Ricardo in Phuket? A nanny?

Posted by John Phoenix on February 25, 2011 18:02

Editor Comment:

What if a nanny - or other family members - were involved, John? Would that prove some point for you? Neither parent appears to have spent a great deal of time with Ricardo in his first nine years. It's a pity we couldn't fast-forward the next nine years and let him decide what he wants to do with his life.


When Ricardo was in Phuket he was cared for by his mother Sumetha, and when Sumetha was studying and testing in Bangkok, Ricardo's aunt and uncle watched after him.

To further clarify, Ricardo's mother Sumetha is studying in Bangkok and will not remain for no more than the few months necessary to complete her certification in restaurant management. Upon completion, Sumetha plans to return to Phuket where she will put her education to work in one of our existing restaurants, or possibly open a new restaurant.

Posted by Prangtip Sakornsin on February 27, 2011 03:36

Editor Comment:

Thanks, Khun Prangtip. Good of you to tell us all we need to know.


Dear Editor, first i must thank you to waste your time for my soap opera. But now i have to disturb you to transfer some words for some commentator as Khun Lena ....... Mr.van Alphen left Phuket for BKK in a morning of april 2002 and check in in a hotel there.(he did not want to go to my parent's house in Nonthaburi because in November 2001 my mother tried to protect me with a knife when Mr.van Alphen going to kick me.) Then he went to a bank for exchanging but while the agent was counting about 3000 euros for him. The other agent had a problem with an another customer ( he was a foreigner ) til the security have to come to clear the situation. Mr. van Alphen took this opportunity to sign and take this amount and walk away without giving thai bath. In the night he change the rest of thai bath that my aunt gave to him in the airport. Few days later a police came to my work and ask me his address in Holland but i know only he went back to stay with a friend in DenHaag named Robby (Miss Ching-Yong know him well) Few week later, Mr. van Alphen called and asked me to send 5000 bath of 10 bath coin for a friend who have and old jukebox ( in reality is for a gambling machine) that all i know it in December 2002.

Posted by sumetra choosaneh on March 16, 2011 16:22

Wednesday July 17, 2024
Horizon Karon Beach Resort & Spa


Facebook Twitter