Tourism News

Tourism News Phuketwan Tourism News
facebook recommendations

NEWS ALERTS

Sign up now for our News Alert emails and the latest breaking news plus new features.

Click to subscribe

Existing subscribers can unsubscribe here

RSS FEEDS

EU envoys were briefed by  Phuketwan journalists and Andy Hall in June

EU Delegation Urges Thailand to Speed Timetable for Return to Democracy

Thursday, September 24, 2015
BANGKOK: The European Union Delegation and EU ambassadors have just released the following statement:

''The EU Delegation reaffirms the EU's strong commitment to the Thai people with whom the EU has strong and longstanding political, economic and cultural ties and people to people contacts. As a friend and partner of Thailand, the EU has repeatedly called for the democratic process to be restored.

''At a time when the drafting process of a new constitution is starting, the EU Delegation again calls upon the Thai government to respect freedom of speech and assembly. Only a full and free public debate in which also critical voices can be heard will allow for true reform and reconciliation.

''The EU Delegation believes that the rule of law and the protection and promotion of human rights are crucial elements for stability and progress and calls upon the Thai authorities to abide by Thailand's obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.''

The highly-regarded International Commission of Jurists, with Thai Lawyers for Human Rights, has just made a submission to the UN Human Rights Council for the Second Universal Periodic Review of Thailand, due in April, 2016.

The submission details the situation in Thailand and makes recommendations on such issues as human rights, enforced disappearances, torture and other ill-treatment.

Under the heading Criminal Defamation the organisations have this to say:

27. Numerous human rights defenders have faced criminal defamation lawsuits in Thailand, under articles 326 to 328 of the Thai Criminal Code. Criminal defamation under articles 326 and 327 carry a maximum sentence of one year's imprisonment whilst criminal defamation by ''means of publication'' under article 328 carries a sentence of up to two years' imprisonment.

If the alleged defamation is perpetrated through a computer system, defendants are sometimes also charged under article 14 the vaguely worded Computer Crimes Act, which carries a maximum sentence of five years' imprisonment.

The ICJ has called for Thailand's criminal defamation laws to be repealed.

28. Natural Fruit Company Ltd. has filed four criminal and civil defamation complaints against Andy Hall, a British human rights defender and labor researcher in Thailand working with a Finnish NGO, Finnwatch. In January 2013, Hall's findings were published in a Finnwatch report called 'Cheap Has a High Price.'

The report alleged various human rights violations taking place at the company such as the confiscation of employees' passports; violence from guards and superiors; dangerous working conditions; child labor; and illegally low wages and overtime.

On September 18, 2015, the Thai Appeal Court dismissed one of the criminal defamation proceedings. The other three proceedings are still before the courts (in one of the proceeding Hall is also charged with offences under the Computer Crimes Act)

29. In December 2013, the Royal Thai Navy lodged a criminal complaint against the editors of an online news website in Thailand, Phuketwan, for quoting a Reuters article that implicated ''Thai naval forces'' in the trafficking of Rohingya.

The two journalists were charged with criminal defamation and an offence under the Computer Crimes Act. Despite international pressure, including by the ICJ, to drop the charges, a three-day trial took place in July,2015. On September 1, 2015, the Court acquitted both accused on all counts, ruling, inter alia, that the Computer Crimes Act was not intended to be used in cases of defamation.

The prosecution had 30 days from the date of the decision to lodge an appeal, which had not expired at the time of this submission.

30. On 20 May 2014, the Royal Thai army filed a criminal complaint against human rights defender, Pornpen Khongkachonkiet, and her organisation, Cross Cultural Foundation (CrCF), for ''damaging the reputation'' of the Paramilitary Unit in the deep South of Thailand after she wrote an open letter requesting an investigation into allegations that military personnel had beaten a man during arrest.

In August 2015, the police informed Pornpen Khongkachonkiet that the prosecutor has decided not to prosecute her.

31. At a preliminary hearing on August 20, 2015, a Court in Mae Sot indicted a community based human rights defender, Suraphan Rujichaiwat, from Loei Province, on charges of criminal defamation and violation of section 14(1) of the Computer Crimes Act.

The case concerns the private prosecution of Rujichaiwat by a gold mining company, Tungkhum Company, which is in a dispute with the local community about the impact of its operations in the area.

32. While in some of these cases the prosecuting authorities or the Courts have eventually acted in manner consistent with the freedom of expression and opinion of the individuals concerned, the ICJ and TLHR remain concerned about the chilling effect that the continued existence of and resort to criminal defamation have on the rights to freedom of opinion and expression in the country.

About the International Commission of Jurists
Composed of 60 eminent judges and lawyers from all regions of the world, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) promotes and protects human rights through the Rule of Law, by using its unique legal expertise to develop and strengthen national and international justice systems. Established in 1952, in consultative status with the Economic and Social Council since 1957, and active on the five continents, the ICJ aims to ensure the progressive development and effective implementation of international human rights and international humanitarian law; secure the realisation of civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights; safeguard the separation of powers; and guarantee the independence of the judiciary and legal profession.

About Thai Lawyers for Human Rights
Thai Lawyers for Human Rights (TLHR), a coalition of human rights lawyers and defenders, formed immediately following the May 2014 coup d'etat in Thailand. The collective's aim has since been to raise awareness about human rights violations resulting from the imposition of martial law and military rule in the country. The organisation runs a 24-hour hotline and uses the information gathered to disseminate public awareness and advice for those summoned or arrested. TLHR provides free litigation and legal assistance for vulnerable people whose rights have been affected by martial law and who do not have legal representatives.

Comments

Comments have been disabled for this article.

gravatar

In my opinion, the EU needs to go sort out its own problems before preaching to other countries.

Look where EU democracy got the Middle East & Africa (with the backlash felt in Europe) when they deposed the 2 'dictators' who were holding the region together in Iraq & Libya.

We laugh at Thais globe trotting at great expense; well these delegates & ambassadors are no different; I doubt they fly economy class or on budget airlines.

Posted by Logic on September 24, 2015 13:34

gravatar

@ Logic

Are you seriously advocating the denial of basic human rights ? Thailand is bound by international treaties it has signed to uphold those rights.

Is it your opinion that the EU, or anyone else for that matter, should not stand up for those rights to be protected ?

Sounds more like you are a fan of oppressive military dictators like Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi. Yes, it's impressive how they were able to "hold the region together", at the barrel of a gun mind you.

Is that what you want for Thailand ?

If so, then you are certainly off to a good start.

Use intimidation, arbitrary arrests, attitude adjustment and outright violence and behold, suddenly the populace appears a lot calmer.

If we were to follow your lead, no nation could ever criticize anyone for anything ever again because there is not one single nation which has no problems to sort out "before preaching to other countries"

I will give you credit for your pseudonym though as I've always appreciated irony.

Posted by Herbert on September 24, 2015 14:35

gravatar

There is a certain irony in the fact that none of the people in the top positions of the EU were elected.

Posted by Stuart on September 24, 2015 15:20

gravatar

Stuart

what you said is just plain non-sense.

Every position in the EU hierarchy, except officials in the European Commission and administrative staff, are elected following one or another procedure, following different formulas on voting /approval.

If you mean that they are not elected through direct democracy protocols, then it is even more silly argument, as direct democracy exists merelty as an exception, in Switzerland, few states in the US, and few other cases. The rest of democratic communities relies on elected representative on making decision and making other appointments, exactly like within the EU bodies for now.

Then you apparently don't understand what is the Delelgation of the EU in Thailand: it is administrative body under European External Action Service (EEAS), they are officials, similar liek offciial of any minsitry, incl. MFA. So they rae hired as any official, not elected like politicians.
http://goo.gl/aUvhRt
http://goo.gl/vZKrYY
http://goo.gl/fDOF4L
The head of EEAS is Fr. Mogherini now.
And yes, she has been approved by European Parliament , that has been directly elected by the EU citizen, then also by the EU Council, - heads of states, who, assumingly, have been elected following domestic democratic procedures,and in consent with the President of European Commission(approved by the similar procedure himself);

"Background on the appointment of the EU High Representative

The European Council appoints by qualified majority, and with the agreement of the President of the Commission, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (Article 18.1 TEU). His or her term of office is five years, in line with that of the other Commissioners.

The High Representative, the Commission President and the other members of the Commission are subject, as a body, to a vote of consent by the European Parliament. On the basis of this consent, the whole Commission will finally be appointed by the European Council, acting by a qualified majority."

Posted by Sue on September 24, 2015 17:20

gravatar

@stuart: they were elected. Don't know what you think. But for eg, the German chancellor Merkel was not elected by the people only by parliament. But you would never say, she is not democratically legitimized. The head of the EU is elected by elected member states officials also. So they all have a democratic election to face, even get into scrutiny of the European Parliament and their vote. So please don't uninform people with this utter rubbish.

and logic: never heart the "EU" deposed Iraq and Libya leaders. That was in the first case mostly the US and the second France and the Great Islands with mandate from then UN. But I am with you connotation, that these dictators kept the even more crazy religious people at bay.

Posted by Lena on September 24, 2015 17:49

gravatar

Well Lena & Sue I think it is you that have been brain washed. Jean-Claude Juncker (AKA God to you) is the defacto (puppet) ruler of Europe and the EU citizens did not elect him. As what he says goes that position should be elected by the EU citizens otherwise obviously not democratic. You might as well say a head of an army is democratically elected as him was put there by an elected government.
Most EU citizens now want out of the EU (UK recent poll says 53% want out, of the other 47% there are many don't know's, Eastern Europe are regretting it, Greece was crippled and economically invaded and many more. Only the Germans are doing well out of it. But will any country be allowed their democratic right to leave? No chance as vested interests won't let it happen. Any referendum will be rigged and everyone knows it.
If it was that good why did you two ladies move to Thailand?

Posted by Stuart on September 24, 2015 19:30

gravatar

Democracy is relevant... relevant to the situation/ culture/ country. Perhaps it shouldn't be, but the reality is the general belief in the West that democracy means citizens have an all powerful voice that can effectively shape the way things are done at the national level, lacks any serious proof in reality. Citizens have a voice in certain situations, not others, and not always is it listened too. Practical democracy today is what it is, imperfect. But there doesn't appear to be an alternative.

The EU reps are never going to be voted by EU citizens in the current version of democracy, but you could argue there is an element of democracy in the way their are elected by representatives of citizens.

Complicated? Yes. Effective? Not really. Where does Average Joe stand? At the very back of the line, a puppet of the powerful.

Posted by Duncan on September 25, 2015 09:03

Editor Comment:

Military rule may work better for the EU, you think?

gravatar

Good weather and nice foods, unique culture on the level of an Ave.Joe and yes, ever available massages, Stuart,certainly, not because of favouring political developmens or corruption - in that case we would be better to Finland or Norway...

Posted by Sue on September 25, 2015 10:34

gravatar

Duncan,

I beg you, the only form of democracy is a direct democracy...? :O

These years since Plato and Aristotle just waistedt in the vain for thinking on a structure and function of state, welcome to the Ancient Greece! I reincarnated back in tortoise,what about you?

Posted by Sue on September 25, 2015 10:43


Sunday November 24, 2024
Horizon Karon Beach Resort & Spa

FOLLOW PHUKETWAN

Facebook Twitter