Tourism News

Tourism News Phuketwan Tourism News
facebook recommendations


Sign up now for our News Alert emails and the latest breaking news plus new features.

Click to subscribe

Existing subscribers can unsubscribe here


Thailand and Human Trafficking: The Reasons for the Downgrade

Thailand and Human Trafficking: The Reasons for the Downgrade

Friday, June 20, 2014
PHUKET: It was back in 2009 that a Thai military officer leaned towards Phuketwan journalist Chutima Sidasathian and asked: ''Are you a Thai?''

An effort was being made by a senior officer to explain away the ''pushbacks'' of Rohingya boatpeople to their deaths as somehow being in the national interest of Thailand.

''Are you a Thai?''

Not a lot has changed in five years.

We know that there are still senior Royal Thai Navy officers who continue to ask journalists: ''Are you a Thai?'' as if that somehow justifies the mistreatment of innocent men, women and children, the human trafficking, the loss of lives.

The right answer to the question, ''Are you a Thai?'' is, ''Of course I am a Thai, but the treatment of Rohingya boatpeople requires everyone to answer as a human being first.''

Thailand's coup commander, General Prayuth Chan-ocha, was speaking on television tonight almost at the same time as the US State Department's Trafficking in Persons report was being unveiled in Washington.

We suspect that if the general was asked in the context of human trafficking: ''Are you a Thai?'' he would answer: ''Of course I am a Thai, but first I am a human being.''

He appears to not be the kind of military officer who would use the issue of national security as an excuse for deception and the abuse by the military and authorities of the downtrodden.

And if the media asks him in the next few days about what will follow in terms of Thailand's downgrading on the US State Department's Trafficking in Persons report, we hope he will respond in similar fashion to his televised speech tonight.

He aims to eliminate the exploiters and to make all systems transparent to the people of Thailand, and to the world. At Phuketwan, we find that a welcome change of approach.

Here is the Thailand section of the Trafficking in Persons report in full:

Thailand is a source, destination, and transit country for men, women, and children subjected to forced labor and sex trafficking. Victims from neighboring countries, as well as China, Vietnam, Russia, Uzbekistan, India, and Fiji, migrate willingly to Thailand to seek employment, often with the assistance of relatives and community members or through the use of informal recruitment and smuggling networks.

There are an estimated two to three million migrant workers in Thailand, most of whom are from Burma. The majority of the trafficking victims within Thailand tens of thousands of victims, by conservative estimates are migrants from Thailand's neighboring countries who are forced, coerced, or defrauded into labor or exploited in the sex trade.

A significant portion of labor trafficking victims within Thailand are exploited in commercial fishing, fishing-related industries, low-end garment production, factories, and domestic work; some victims are forced to beg on the streets.

There are reports of corrupt officials on both sides of the border who facilitate the smuggling of undocumented migrants between Thailand and neighboring countries including Laos, Burma, and Cambodia; many of these migrants subsequently become trafficking victims.

Unidentified trafficking victims are among the large numbers of undocumented migrants deported to Laos, Burma, and Cambodia each year. Burmese, Cambodian, and Thai men are subjected to forced labor on Thai fishing boats that travel throughout Southeast Asia and beyond; some men remain at sea for up to several years, are paid very little, are expected to work 18 to 20 hours per day for seven days a week, or are threatened and physically beaten.

A 2013 report found that approximately 17 percent of surveyed fishermen, who primarily worked on short haul vessels spending less than one month at sea, experienced forced labor conditions, often due to threats of financial penalty including not being fully remunerated for work already performed.

A 2010 assessment of the cumulative risk of labor trafficking among Burmese migrant workers in the seafood industry in Samut Sakhon found that 57 percent of the 430 workers surveyed experienced conditions of forced labor. As fishing is an unregulated industry region-wide, fishermen typically do not have written employment contracts with their employers.

Reports during the year indicate this form of forced labor continues to be prevalent, and that increasing international scrutiny has led traffickers to use new methods, making their crimes more difficult to detect. Men from Thailand, Burma, and Cambodia are forced to work on Thai-flagged fishing boats in Thai and international waters and were rescued from countries including Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, and Timor-Leste. The number of Cambodian victims rescued from Thai fishing vessels in countries around the world more than doubled in 2013. Cambodian and Burmese workers are increasingly unwilling to work in the Thai fishing industry due to dangerous and exploitative work conditions which make them more vulnerable to trafficking.

There continued to be reports that corrupt Thai civilian and
military officials profited from the smuggling of Rohingya asylum
seekers from Burma and Bangladesh (who transit through
Thailand in order to reach Malaysia or Indonesia) and were
complicit in their sale into forced labor on fishing vessels.

Thai navy and marine officials allegedly diverted to Thailand
boats carrying Rohingya asylum seekers en route to Malaysia
and facilitated the transfer of some migrants to smugglers and
brokers who sold some Rohingya into forced labor on fishing

Additionally, there are media reports that some Thai police officials systematically removed Rohingya men from
detention facilities in Thailand and sold them to smugglers and
brokers; these smugglers and brokers allegedly transported the
men to southern Thailand where some were forced to work as
cooks and guards in camps, or were sold into forced labor on
farms or in shipping companies.

Traffickers (including labor brokers) who bring foreign victims into Thailand generally work as individuals or in unorganised groups, while those who exploit Thai victims abroad tend to be more organised. Labor brokers, largely unregulated and of both Thai and foreign nationalities, serve as intermediaries between job-seekers and employers; some facilitate or engage in human trafficking and collaborate with employers and at times with corrupt law enforcement officials.

Foreign migrants, members of ethnic minorities, and stateless
persons in Thailand are at the greatest risk of being trafficked,
and they experience various abuses that may indicate trafficking,
including the withholding of travel documents, migrant
registration cards, work permits, and wages. They may also
experience illegal salary deductions by employers, physical
and verbal abuse, and threats of deportation.

Undocumented migrants are highly vulnerable to trafficking due to their lack of legal status, which often makes them fearful of reporting problems to government officials. Many migrant workers incur exorbitant debts, both in Thailand and in countries of origin,
to obtain employment and may therefore be subjected to debt

Members of ethnic minorities and stateless persons
in Thailand face elevated risks of becoming trafficking victims.
Highland men, women, and children in the northern areas of
Thailand are particularly vulnerable to trafficking; UN research
cites a lack of legal status as the primary causal factor of their
exploitation. Some children from Thailand, Cambodia, and
Burma are forced by their parents or brokers to sell flowers,
beg, or work in domestic service in urban areas.

Thai victims are recruited for employment opportunities abroad and deceived into incurring large debts to pay broker and recruitment fees, sometimes using family-owned land as collateral, making them vulnerable to exploitation at their destination. Thai nationals have been subjected to forced labor or sex trafficking in Australia, South Africa, and in countries in the Middle East, North America, Europe, and Asia. Some Thai men who migrate for low-skilled contract work and agricultural labor are subjected to conditions of forced labor and debt bondage.

The majority of Thai victims identified during the year were
found in sex trafficking. Women and girls from Thailand, Laos,
Vietnam, and Burma, including some who initially intentionally
seek work in Thailand's extensive sex trade, are subjected to sex

Child sex trafficking, once known to occur in highly
visible establishments, has become increasingly clandestine,
occurring in massage parlors, bars, karaoke lounges, hotels, and
private residences. Children who have false identity documents
are exploited in the sex trade in karaoke or massage parlors.

Local NGOs report an increasing use of social media to recruit
women and children into sex trafficking. Victims are subjected
to sex trafficking in venues that cater to local demand and in
business establishments in Bangkok and Chiang Mai that cater
to foreign tourists' demand for commercial sex.

Thailand is a transit country for victims from North Korea, China, Vietnam, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Burma subjected to sex trafficking or forced labor in countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Russia, South Korea, the United States, and countries in Western Europe.

There were reports that separatist groups in southern
Thailand continued to recruit and use children to commit acts
of arson or serve as scouts.

The Government of Thailand does not fully comply with the
minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking. In the
2012 and 2013 TIP Reports, Thailand was granted consecutive
waivers from an otherwise required downgrade to Tier 3 on
the basis of a written plan to bring itself into compliance with
the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking.

The Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) authorises a maximum of two consecutive waivers. A waiver is no longer available to Thailand, which is therefore deemed not to be making significant efforts to comply with the minimum standards and is placed on Tier 3.

The Government of Thailand improved its anti-trafficking
data collection. It reported convicting 225 traffickers under
the 2008 anti-trafficking law and related statutes in 2013.
Overall anti-trafficking law enforcement efforts remained
insufficient compared with the size of the problem in Thailand,
and corruption at all levels hampered the success of these

Despite frequent media and NGO reports documenting
instances of forced labor and debt bondage among foreign
migrants in Thailand's commercial sectors - including the
fishing industry - the government demonstrated few efforts
to address these trafficking crimes.

It systematically failed to investigate, prosecute, and convict ship owners and captains for extracting forced labor from migrant workers, or officials who may be complicit in these crimes; the government convicted two brokers for facilitating forced labor on fishing vessels. The government did not make sufficient efforts to proactively identify trafficking victims among foreign migrants, who remained at risk of punishment for immigration violations.

A critical shortage of available interpretation services across government agencies limited efforts to identify and protect foreign victims, and authorities identified fewer foreign labor trafficking victims than it did during the previous year. There were media reports in 2013 of trafficking-related complicity by Thai civilian and navy personnel in crimes involving the exploitation of Rohingya asylum seekers from Burma and Bangladesh. The Thai navy claimed that these reports were false and responded by filing criminal defamation charges against two journalists in Thailand for re-printing these reports.

Impunity for pervasive traffickingrelated corruption continued to impede progress in combating trafficking.

Recommendations for Thailand:

Promptly and thoroughly investigate all reports of government
complicity in trafficking, and increase efforts, particularly through
the Department of Special Investigation and the Office of
National Anti-Corruption Commission and the Office of Public
Sector Anti-Corruption Commission, to prosecute and punish
officials engaged in trafficking-related corruption; increase efforts
to prosecute and convict trafficking offenders, including those
who subject victims to forced labor in Thailand's commercial
and export oriented sectors; develop and implement victim
identification procedures that prioritise the rights and safety
of potential victims; significantly increase efforts to proactively
identify victims of trafficking among vulnerable populations,
particularly foreign migrants, deportees, and refugees; pursue
criminal investigations of cases in which labor inspections
reveal indicators of forced labor - including the imposition of
significant debts by employers or labor brokers, withholding
of wages, or document confiscation; cease prosecuting criminal
defamation cases against researchers or journalists who report on
human trafficking; recognizing the valuable role of NGOs and
workers' organisations in uncovering the nature and scope of
human trafficking in Thailand, work to establish an environment
conducive to robust civil society participation in all facets of
understanding and combating human trafficking; allow every
adult trafficking victim - including sex trafficking victims - to
travel, work, and reside outside shelters in accordance with
provisions in Thailand's anti-trafficking law; significantly increase
the availability of interpretation services across government
agencies with responsibilities for protecting foreign migrants;
increase incentives for victims to cooperate with law enforcement
in the investigation and prosecution of trafficking cases; consider
establishing a dedicated court division, or take other measures to
consistently expedite the prosecution of trafficking cases; develop
and provide specialized services for child sex trafficking victims
and take appropriate steps to ensure their cases progress quickly; implement court procedures which prioritize the protection of witnesses; restrict bail to alleged trafficking offenders to prevent flight; enact legislation that protects officials against legal retaliation for pursuing trafficking cases; consistently include trained social workers or victim service organizations in victim screening interviews in safe and private spaces; process and approve legal status applications at the national, district, and
provincial level in a timely manner; provide legal alternatives to
the removal of foreign trafficking victims to countries in which
they would face retribution or hardship; increase efforts to seize
assets of trafficking offenders and ensure these funds directly
benefit victims; increase anti-trafficking awareness efforts directed at employers and clients of the sex trade, including sex tourists; and make efforts to decrease the demand for exploitive labor.

The Thai government improved its anti-trafficking data
collection, allowing more accurate reporting on prosecutions
and convictions. Thailand's 2008 anti- trafficking law
criminally prohibits all forms of trafficking and prescribes
penalties ranging from four to 10 years imprisonment
penalties that are sufficiently stringent and commensurate
with penalties prescribed for other serious offenses, such as
rape. The government reported investigating 674 trafficking
cases in 2013, an increase from 306 cases in 2012. Only 80
investigations involved suspected cases of forced labor of migrant
workers, despite the reported high prevalence of this form of
trafficking in Thailand. The government reported prosecuting
483 suspected traffickers, including 374 for sex trafficking, 56
for forced begging, and 53 for other forms of forced labor. The
government reported convicting 225 traffickers using the antitrafficking law and various other statutes in 2013. The majority
of convicted offenders received sentences ranging from one to
seven years' imprisonment, with 29 receiving prison sentences
greater than seven years and 31 receiving sentences of less than
one year. The Anti-Money Laundering Office seized assets of two
convicted traffickers valued to the equivalent of approximately
$1.1 million.
The government did not hold ship owners, captains, or complicit
government officials criminally accountable for labor trafficking
in the commercial fishing industry. With investigative support
from NGOs, the government prosecuted and convicted two
Burmese brokers for facilitating the forced labor of Burmese
men in the commercial fishing industry; one was sentenced
to 33 years' imprisonment and one was sentenced to three
years and six months' imprisonment. A Thai accomplice, a
pier manager who held at least 14 victims in confinement,
was not prosecuted for his role in their victimisation, but was
convicted and sentenced to three months' imprisonment for
providing shelter to undocumented workers. The government
reported no investigations, prosecutions, or convictions of public
officials or private individuals for allegedly subjecting Rohingya
asylum seekers to forced labor in Thailand's commercial fishing
sector. There were no developments in the Supreme Court's
consideration of an appeal of a 2009 conviction, upheld in 2011,
of two offenders found guilty of subjecting 73 victims to forced
labor in a shrimp-peeling factory; both offenders remained
free on bail during the reporting period for a second year. The
government addressed cases involving illegal recruitment fees
and withholding of wages as civil violations under the Labor
Protection Act instead of as criminal cases under the 2008
anti-trafficking law.
In one case, the government reported investigating and
disciplining 33 local police officers on suspicion of protecting a
brothel where child sex trafficking victims were found. However,
trafficking-related corruption remained widespread among
Thai law enforcement personnel. Credible reports indicated
some corrupt officials protected brothels, other commercial
sex venues, and food processing facilities from raids and
inspections; colluded with traffickers; used information from victim interviews to weaken cases; and engaged in commercial
sex acts with child trafficking victims. Local and national-level
police officers established protective relationships with traffickers
in trafficking hot-spot regions to which they were assigned. Thai
police officers and immigration officials reportedly extorted
money or sex from Burmese migrants detained in Thailand for
immigration violations and sold Burmese migrants unable to
pay labor brokers and sex traffickers. Although the government
reported conducting an internal investigation of trafficking related
military complicity in the exploitation of Rohingya
asylum seekers, observers claimed that the government failed
to thoroughly investigate the allegations. In December 2013,
the Thai navy filed a defamation lawsuit against two journalists
from a local newspaper that published excerpts of media reports
that alleged trafficking-related complicity by Thai civilian and
navy personnel.
The government continued to provide training to thousands
of public officials on trafficking victim identification and the
provisions of the anti-trafficking law. It reported numerous
cooperative international investigations. In one case, it
responded to information provided by Burmese police, leading
to the rescue of 10 Burmese victims forced to work in a food processing factory in Thailand, and the arrest of seven suspected
traffickers. In a separate case, responding to a request from a
civil society organisation, officials cooperated with foreign
counterparts in South Africa to rescue Thai women subjected to
sex trafficking and arrested three alleged perpetrators. Challenges
with collaboration between police and prosecutors limited the
success of prosecution efforts. Interagency coordination was
weakened by a rudimentary data collection system that made
it difficult to share information across agencies. Local observers
reported officials were vulnerable to retaliation suits or charges of
defamation if cases were unsuccessful - a disincentive to pursue
difficult cases. Overall, the justice system increased the speed at
which it resolved criminal cases, though some trafficking cases
continued to take three years or longer to reach completion.
Frequent personnel changes hampered the government's ability
to make progress on anti-trafficking law enforcement efforts,
and some suspected offenders fled the country or intimidated
victims after judges decided to grant bail, further contributing
to a sense of impunity among traffickers.

The government's efforts to identify and protect trafficking
victims remained inadequate. The government provided
services to 744 trafficking victims, and the Ministry of Social
Development and Human Security (MSDHS) reported that
it provided assistance to 681 victims at government shelters
(an increase from 526 in 2012), including 305 Thai victims
(compared with 166 Thai victims in 2012), 373 foreign victims
(compared with 360 foreign victims in 2012), and three whose
nationalities were unknown. Authorities identified an additional
63 Thai victims subjected to sex or labor trafficking overseas;
these victims were processed at a government center upon
arrival in the Bangkok airport and returned to their home
communities. The government identified 219 foreign labor
trafficking victims in 2013 - a decrease from 254 identified in
2012. The Thai government continued to refer victims to one
of nine regional trafficking shelters run by the MSDHS, where
they reportedly received counseling, limited legal assistance,
and medical care. Some interpretation services were available
in Burmese, Cambodian, Chinese, and certain ethnic minority
languages. Thai embassy officials, in collaboration with MSDHS,
rescued and repatriated Thai victims identified in Malaysia
and South Africa. There were reports that some personnel in a
Thai embassy overseas may have been unwilling to respond to
requests to assist Thai victims in that country.
The government responded to information provided by NGOs
and foreign governments to identify and rescue victims. Although
it reported using systematic procedures to screen for victims
among vulnerable populations and placed posters explaining
victims' rights in deportation facilities to encourage victims to
self-identify, its proactive efforts to screen for victims among
vulnerable groups remained inadequate. NGOs reported that the
government did not provide adequate interpretation services or
private spaces to screen potential victims, severely limiting the
effectiveness of such efforts. During the year, the government
trained 95 new interpreters. The government reported deploying
multi-disciplinary teams to interview 2,985 Rohingya asylum
seekers and Bangladeshi migrants identified during raids
on camps in southern Thailand to screen for indications of
trafficking. Despite media and NGO reports throughout the year
that some individuals among this population were subjected
to forced labor in Thailand, the government did not identify a
Rohingya victim of trafficking. Experts highlight that Rohingya
victims may have been hesitant to identify themselves as
trafficking victims due to fears they would subsequently be sent
back to their country of origin. Thailand's laws do not provide
legal alternatives to removal for foreign trafficking victims who
may face retribution or hardship in their countries of origin.

Many victims, particularly undocumented migrants who feared
legal consequences from interacting with authorities, were
hesitant to identify themselves as victims, and front-line officials
were not adequately trained to identify indicators of trafficking
when victims did not self-identify. Law enforcement officers
often believed physical detention or confinement was the
essential element to confirm trafficking and failed to recognise
exploitive debt or manipulation of undocumented migrants'
fear of deportation as non-physical forms of coercion used in
human trafficking. In some provinces, the government used
multidisciplinary teams consisting of social workers and law
enforcement officers to identify and rescue victims, but only law
enforcement officials were able to make the final determination
to certify an individual as a trafficking victim; in cases of debt
bondage, the denial of certification at times occurred over the
objection of social service providers.

The government issued six-month work permits and visas
(renewable for the duration of court cases) that allowed 128
foreign victims to work temporarily in Thailand during the course
of legal proceedings, an increase from 107 in 2012. Seventeen
adult female victims received permits; some victims were not
allowed to work due to the government's assessment that it
would be unsafe or unhealthy for them to do so. Women without
work permits were typically required to stay in government
shelters and could not leave the premises unattended until Thai
authorities were ready to repatriate them. There were reports that
victims, including those allowed to work, were only given a copy
of their identity documents and work permits, while the original
documents were kept by government officials. The government
disbursed the equivalent of approximately $145,000 from its
anti-trafficking fund to victims. These funds were allocated
among 525 victims, including paying for the repatriation of 335
foreign victims. Seventy-five trafficking victims benefited from
the government's general crime victim compensation scheme,
which disbursed the equivalent of approximately $65,000 in
2013. The 2008 anti-trafficking law includes provisions for
civil compensation for victims; the government filed petitions
on behalf of 68 victims, and requested a total equivalent of
approximately $580,000, though there were no judgments
allowing the disbursement of these funds during the year.
Although more than three-quarters of identified victims were
children, the government did not offer specialized services for
child sex trafficking victims. The prosecution of some cases
involving foreign child victims continued to take two years or
longer. Judicial officials did not always follow procedures to
ensure the safety of witnesses; victims, including children, were
at times forced to testify in front of alleged perpetrators and
some were forced to publicly disclose personal information, such
as their address, which put them at serious risk of retaliation.
The government did not provide legal alternatives to victims
who faced retribution or hardship upon return to their home
countries; foreign victims were systematically repatriated if
they were unwilling to testify or following the conclusion of
legal proceedings. NGOs reported concerns over the lack of
appropriate options for foreign children whose families were
complicit in their trafficking or who could not be identified. Local
observers in Cambodia reported that a number of Cambodians,
who were identified as trafficking victims or people vulnerable
to trafficking by Thai authorities, were nonetheless held in Thai
detention centers for one month prior to their repatriation. A
2005 cabinet resolution established that stateless trafficking
victims in Thailand could be given residency status on a case by-
case basis; however, the Thai government had yet to report
granting residency status to a foreign or stateless trafficking
victim. Thai law protects victims from being prosecuted for acts
committed as a result of being trafficked; however, the serious
flaws in the Thai government's victim identification procedures
and its aggressive efforts to arrest and deport immigration
violators increased victims' risk of being re-victimised and treated
as criminals. Inadequate victim identification procedures may
have resulted in some victims being treated as law violators
following police raids of brothels. Unidentified victims
were likely among the 190,144 migrant workers subjected
to government citations for lack of proper documentation
during the year, as well as among Rohingya men detained in
sometimes-overcrowded detention facilities.

The government continued efforts to prevent trafficking. In
October 2013, Thailand ratified the 2000 UN TIP Protocol.
The government allotted the equivalent of approximately
$6.1 million to conduct anti-trafficking efforts. It conducted
campaigns through the use of radio, television, billboards,
and handouts to raise public awareness of the dangers of
human trafficking throughout the country. Media reported
that the government invested more than the equivalent of
approximately $400,000 in a communication strategy to improve
the public image of its efforts to combat human trafficking.
The use of criminal defamation laws to prosecute individuals
for researching or reporting on human trafficking may have
discouraged efforts to combat trafficking. Four UN special
rapporteurs expressed concerns that an ongoing prosecution
against an anti-trafficking and migrant's rights advocate, in an
act of retaliation for his research documenting alleged trafficking
violations in a food processing factory in Thailand, may have
had the effect of silencing other human rights advocates, and
that the government did not adequately address the underlying
allegations of violations in the report in question. NGOs
expressed similar concerns over a criminal defamation lawsuit
filed by the Thai navy against two journalists in December 2013
for publishing excerpts of media reports that alleged trafficking-related complicity by Thai civilian and navy personnel.
The process to legalise migrant workers involved high fees
and poorly regulated and unlicensed labor brokers, increasing
the vulnerability of migrant workers to trafficking and debt
bondage. The government took no steps to improve this process
or improve laws to regulate inbound recruitment agencies
and fees. The government, through its inaction to process and
approve legal status applications, failed to take measures to
reduce the vulnerability to trafficking of members of Thailand's
hill tribe communities; some of these applications have been
pending for four years. Government labor inspections of 40,963
worksites did not result in the identification of any suspected
cases of labor trafficking. The Marine Police and the Thai navy did not uncover any suspected cases of trafficking during ownership and registration inspections of 10,427 vessels. The government opened seven labor coordination centers, operated by the Ministry of Labor, to increase registration of workers and address labor shortages in the fishing industry and create a centralised hiring hall for prospective workers. More than 10,400 fishermen were registered with 395 employers through the coordination centers. Although it acknowledged the labor shortage was due in large part to some workers' unwillingness to work in the fishing industry due to poor working and living conditions,
the government did not make efforts to significantly improve
these conditions during the year. The government did not pass
revisions to labor laws which could help improve protection for
workers on fishing vessels. Weak law enforcement, inadequate
human and financial resources, and fragmented coordination
among regulatory agencies in the fishing industry contributed to
overall impunity for exploitative labor practices in this sector. In
November 2013, the government passed a ministerial regulation
requiring employers to deduct a refundable fee from workers'
salaries to contribute to a ''repatriation fund''; the imposition of
additional fees and the introduction of additional bureaucratic
requirements on migrant workers could increase their debt
burden. The Ministry of Labor established centers in 10 provinces
to provide information and services to Thai workers seeking
employment overseas, but the Department of Employment
remained ineffective in regulating the excessive fees incurred
by these workers in order to obtain employment, which make
them vulnerable to debt bondage.

During the year, the government revoked the licenses of two labor
recruitment agencies, suspended the license of four agencies,
and filed criminal charges against nine companies (four of
which were fined) and 155 illegal agents that sent Thai workers
abroad. In an effort to prevent child sex tourism, the government
denied entry to 79 known foreign sex offenders and launched
a public awareness campaign warning tourists of the strict
penalties for engaging in sex with minors. The government
also developed a surveillance network on child sex tourism by
training business operators in high-risk areas to identify and
report cases to the police. The government did not make other
efforts to decrease the demand for commercial sex acts or forced
labor. The government did not provide Thai security forces with
anti-trafficking training prior to their deployment abroad on
international peacekeeping missions, though it briefed diplomats
on human trafficking before their departure to overseas posts.


Comments have been disabled for this article.


Sounds like the General might be the best defence witness in a certain action against some journalists.
Would not be surprised if some common sense soon results in the strike of a pen!
The benefit to the military would be immeasurable.

Posted by Manowar on June 20, 2014 23:07


1. General Prayuth indeed well addressed measures against trafficking, incl, that of Rohingya:

"The army chief said illegal workers would be allowed to work temporarily in the country while the junta worked out long-term solutions, including plans to register them and verify the nationality of undocumented workers.
One proposal he made was for reception centres to be set up to help groups such as the stateless Muslim Rohingya, who are fleeing persecution that borders on genocide in Myanmar. "

2. It is clear that cost base of fishing and fish/shrimp farming industries will have to go up, and as a consequence a price of produce will increase.
It's difficult to estimate possible scale of increase, but on such markets like shrimps in North America , it is possible that Thailand will lose some market share.
Since increase of prices of fish/shrimp will decrease a demand, then it will lead to some decrease of volume of both industries, with continuing overfishing also being a factor.
That all means some structural changes within Thailand economy, but as so high % of immigrant labor is used in fishing , then decrease of industry may not affect local employment , but only few immigrant workers will be recruited.

3. Report has at least 2 references to PW and one to Finnwatch guy.
It is very welcome attraction of attention, and provably timely too, as , very probably, highest persons in charge will make acquainted themselves with the report, and , as these reference are so in bold there, will probably act on it to amiable resolution of these cases, as it obvious, they are kind of misunderstanding.

Posted by Sue on June 21, 2014 00:29


''The Thai navy claimed that these reports were false and responded by filing criminal defamation charges against two journalists in Thailand for re-printing these reports. Impunity for pervasive trafficking-related corruption continued to impede progress in combating trafficking."
Phuketwan indirectly immortalised by Big Brother, who does take note sometimes

Posted by Tbs on June 21, 2014 05:50


Many of the 'media reports' noted in the reasons for downgrade originated at Phuketwan. It has been 5 challenging and frustrating years for you since you first broke the story, but your great efforts are showing results. Very well done, indeed, PW!

Posted by Treelover on June 21, 2014 07:26


Good work PW and USA. Sickening report... hopefully this international disgracing in the serious report, combined with martial law will be the events that push Thailand to clean up slavery. If not, god help us as I fear nothing will.

Posted by J on June 21, 2014 12:17


@ J
Good work USA??
Let them close Quantanomo bay first before telling others what to do. No human rights there at all.

Posted by FS on June 21, 2014 13:25


"ARE YOU A THAI?" ( LOL ) Well, actually no, and I'm not a racist either, nor an apologist for graft and corruption, but I still have empathy for others, and believe in the Golden Rule, does that make me a loser (to,two,too)?

Posted by farang888 on June 22, 2014 21:22


If it wasn't so pathetic it would be too funny.."ARE YOU A THAI?".. What answer do YOU think he was he seeking? Three choices for your perusal..

1. Yes, but dump them overboard anyway.

2. No, but dump them overboard anyway.

3. Er, I am half Thai and half Farang, a
LOOK LIN, but dump them overboard anyway.

Posted by farang888 on June 22, 2014 21:34

Monday December 4, 2023
Horizon Karon Beach Resort & Spa


Facebook Twitter