Tourism News

Tourism News Phuketwan Tourism News
facebook recommendations

NEWS ALERTS

Sign up now for our News Alert emails and the latest breaking news plus new features.

Click to subscribe

Existing subscribers can unsubscribe here

RSS FEEDS

Rohingya Silence Leaves Aung San Suu Kyi Speechless and Alone

Thursday, May 28, 2015
BANGKOK: Malaysia's former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad has joined a growing number of international figures criticising Myanmar's opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi for failing to speak out against the persecution of Rohingya.

In a speech to a conference on the plight of the Rohingyas at the Nobel Institute in Norway - which awarded Ms Suu Kyi its peace prize in 1991 for her stand against Myanmar's brutal military regime - Dr Mahathir said she should realise that oppression by Myanmar's government is intolerable.

Dr Mahathir joined US philanthropist George Soros and Nobel laureates Desmond Tutu, Mairead Maguire and Jose Ramos-Horta at the two-day Oslo Conference on Myanmar's Systematic Persecution of Rohingya on May 26 and 27.

"And yet few people from Myanmar have risen to the occasion to defend the rights of Rohingya who, after all, are citizens of Myanmar," Dr Mahathir said.

Myanmar's military-dominated government regards the 1.3 million Rohingya living in western Arakan state as illegal migrants from Bangladesh and refuses them citizenship despite their having lived there for centuries.

Ms Suu Kyi was pointedly not invited to the Norway conference.

Archbishop Tutu told the conference via video link that the plight of Rohingya was "one of the most enduring human rights crises on Earth".

"As lovers of peace and believers in the right of all members of the family to dignity and security, we have particular responsibilities to the Rohingya," he said.

The Dalai Lama, human rights and refugee groups have called on Ms Suu Kyi to speak up for Rohingya as a humanitarian crisis involving thousands of people fleeing Myanmar has unfolded across the Bay of Bengal, where thousands of people are believed be adrift at sea.

More than 2500 migrants could still be stranded on boats, according to estimates by the United Nations.

The UNHCR, the UN's refugee agency, cautioned that its figures for those still risking sickness and starvation at sea were loose estimates.

"What we know is the arrivals, especially in Indonesia where we have full access, and in Thailand, where we have access," said Vivian Tan, a spokeswoman for the UNHCR in Bangkok.

"In Malaysia the figures are from the government and in Myanmar we have an estimate. What we're not sure about are those who are still at sea. This is a combination of media reports, survivor accounts and any other local resources."

The UN and the US have said the deadly pattern of migration across the Bay of Bengal will continue unless Myanmar ends discrimination against the mostly Muslim Rohingya.

Ms Suu Kyi bristles when asked why she has failed to denounce religious bigotry in Myanmar.

"Those who criticise me for not condemning one side or the other - they've never said exactly what they hope will come out of such condemnation," she was quoted as saying last month.

"You're just taking the moral high ground for the sake of sounding good - it sounds a little irresponsible."

International outrage over the discovery of mass graves and prison camps of people from Myanmar and Bangladesh and the abandonment of thousands of others on the open sea after a crackdown on human trafficking networks in Thailand and Malaysia has caused a backlash in Myanmar, where Buddhists fear the Muslim world's backing of the Rohingya.

About 300 people, led by about 30 Buddhist monks, shouted slogans against the United Nations and Western media during a protest march in Yangon on Wednesday. Protesters carried banners calling the migrants and asylum seekers "terrorists" and "beasts".

A 17-nation meeting to discuss the Rohingya crisis will be held in Bangkok on Friday.

with Reuters

Comments

Comments have been disabled for this article.

gravatar

About 300 people, led by about 30 Buddhist monks, shouted slogans against the United Nations and Western media during a protest march in Yangon on Wednesday. Protesters carried banners calling the migrants and asylum seekers "terrorists" and "beasts".

Interesting that it is the the Burman mobs who are burning people alive. There was such global outrage when ISIS burned a pilot recently.

Yet the asylum seekers are said to be the "terrorists" and "beasts".

The Buddhist monk Wirathu says the Rohingya treat the Buddhists as "animals" yet he constantly describes the Rohingya as "carp", "dogs", "jackals" and "snakes" and pumps out these messages on social media.

We have such clear examples of gross hypocrisy.

Posted by Ian Yarwood on May 28, 2015 17:28

Editor Comment:

The Government of Burma could agree to allow citizenship for the Rohingya - and unleash a wave of violence that might achieve its real aim, the ethnic cleansing of Rakhine state. So international intervention by some kind of peace-keeping force will be necessary while the Burmese government re-educates the populace about true Buddhist behavior and democratic tolerance.

gravatar

A Nobel prize is one of the highest awards you can achieve on this planet. It is a great honor to get it. You must have achieved something very special to earn it and is an award of the greatest honor a human can obtain. Like it is an honor you to get it, it should be should be revoked if your performance afterwards is counter dictionary. Like when an awards afterwards seems to be received an false claims Miss Aung San Suu Kyi's currently lack of fairness, lack of courage and lack of using her influence and lack of showing her guts and objectively should be a reason to Revoke her award. A Peace Noble price winner should loss her High status if he / she losses or stops "fighting" for the good of the surpressed one. Khun Aung San Suu Kyi is clearly losing her dignity and her credibility By keeping her silence and this way let's millions "drifting" on sea and letting them down as Human people. No matter where we are born, raised or what color we have. We all come from one and the same place called Earth. This way we should all be treated the same. As human beings otherwise we all fall back to what we are by nature; A bunch of wild Animals.

Posted by phuketgreed on May 28, 2015 17:37

Editor Comment:

Speaking out, though, could trigger more violence. She may be keeping quiet to prevent bloodshed. The mobs in Burma are rabid.

gravatar

@Ian Yarwood Ian having lived in Australia I know how hot they are on Immigration as a lawyer can I ask you if I was an illegal immigrant in Australia and had a child with another illegal immigrant that would still mean my child would be an illegal immigrant, correct. Australia is also a G20 country. The point I am making here is that everyone's attention is on forcing other people to see it their way. I have said many times this is a region wide problem but firstly Myanmar and Bangladesh have to take decisive action. It spears that no country including these two wants these people and on Channel News Asia they are being called something like the "Unwanted People" - solutions are made by compromise not forcing others to see your view. @Ed, even in Australia once an illegal immigrant always an illegal immigrant including one's children. I do stand to be corrected as it would not be the child's fault but suspect logically the child and parents would be deported. Ed before you jump on me take five breaths I am with you on sorting this out but in a more diplomatic manner.

Posted by Feisty Farang on May 28, 2015 19:49

Editor Comment:

There is a distinction between principle and compromise and the key is to decide whether an issue can be compromised or whether the issue is one that should be decided purely on principle. Great politicians are great in being able to sort out one kind of issue from another. Your acceptance of compromise marks you out as having some potential in Australian politics.

gravatar

I can't agree that issue of citizenship and communal genocide are directly related :

an individual has the same basic human rights , except few political ones, like voting, whether or not, he is citizen of this country or another ,or stateless .
British citizens residing in U.S. they don't get such treatment , right?

Another issues aside from communal genocide - there actually two ones - is government policy , that is based on denying citizenship, but , let be clear, do they claim that then Rohingya are staying in country illegally and this should leave? I can't recall it, but may be I missed something.

Communal genocide already start to remind Tutsi case, however still is not that ripen to that degree.

I am actually do not see practical means how to end communal genocide.

Yes, some Rohingya are quite indigent to Myanmar, 700 hundreds years or so.
But let's face it - majority of Rohingy people has been brought in the middle of 19th century by Britain, and any association of new arrival with old ones is not in place. It is not valid argument for new arrivals that some number of similar ethnicity resided there for hundreds of years.

I agree that the UK is surely part of problem.
You can't press a country to give citizenship- there is no legal instruments , only political scene - and with hardly any success , although you can request upholding basic human rights.

I think that the UK should act as a leader of Rohingya resettlement program and as principle donor for the cause :
- they should negotiate with other country (-use) purchase of land and legal terms of resettlement ;
- they should provide : 1. construction of basic dwelling 2. training/education for people that they would be able to earn living in a new place

Cost could be say 10,000USD per person, so for 1millionn it comes to ca.10billions USD - that is big money , especially taking into consideration that the program will last like 5-10 years.
UK can perfectly afford it on its own, just by cutting allowances for MPs and some other waste.

UK really well transited from the largest ever empire into a modern state. So it would be if they finish the job and repay some old debts.

Posted by Sue on May 28, 2015 21:31

Editor Comment:

There is no suggestion of Britain becoming involved and it is an issue that the region's governments are unlikely to consider is a matter for any former colonial power. The Royingya claim to have been in Burma before the British.

gravatar

Hi Feisty Farang

I am not entirely sure that I understand what you are trying to say.

In relation to citizenship, the Rohingya whose ancestors had been in Rakhine State for centuries, had their citizenship cancelled in 1982. The Burmans then labelled them as illegal immigrants even though the facts are that they had not immigrated but they were born there and had citizenship just like their parents.

You seem to suggest that "solutions are made by compromise not forcing others to see your view."

I understand what compromise is but I do not follow what you mean in the current context. The "nationalist" Buddhist mobs see Rohingya as a problem within Burma and their solution is to eradicate them by murder and/or diaspora.

Is your idea of compromise that only half as many should be murdered and only half as many scattered by the four winds to die at sea or be taken in by neighbouring countries?

Should only half as many Rohingyas be burnt to death by mobs?

Should there be only half as much hate speech from extremist monks?

@ Ed. I am not the fount of wisdom when it comes to Burma. However, I suspect that you might be right in saying that the reinstatement or granting of citizenship risks a violent backlash as might words of support for Rohingya by Aung San Suu Kyi (ASSK)

Politics is the art of the possible. In the current climate, if ASSK says too much she might do much more harm than good.

Outsiders can take the high moral ground. Journalists can pose impossible questions to ASSK. If she provides a direct, frank answer then the journalists might have a great story - a great scoop - but maybe it could trigger mass murder.

Posted by Ian Yarwood on May 29, 2015 08:13

gravatar

This lady Aung San Suu Kyi lost face on humanitarian grounds.
When she got her Nobel price, there was a text spoken in Stockholm, reflection her being that time.
Now she is not even a shadow of what she was that time.
Hope for Myanmar she not becomes President, as a president is for all inhabitants in a country.
She is not exactly proving she is able.

Posted by Kurt on May 29, 2015 12:30

Editor Comment:

Her voters - Burmese citizens - would tell you another story, Kurt. She is not elected by Rohingya.

gravatar

Mahatma Ghandi:

"Yes I am. I am also a Muslim, a Christian a Buddhist and a Jew."

George Soros:

"I am a Rohingya too."

The free world:

"Je suis Charlie" (I am Charlie Hebdo)

.....

There is a pattern. Words of peace focus on our common humanity. Words of hate focus on our small differences.

The racist monks of Burma appeal to the worst primal instincts in the hearts of men just as the nazis did nearly a century before. Words of hate require no talent. Words of peace might seem simple but they are brilliant.

If ASSK says anything she must choose her words extremely carefully. That is an understatement.

Posted by Ian Yarwood on May 30, 2015 08:16

gravatar

[quote]
...while the Burmese government re-educates the populace
[/quote]

Since they have spent more than one generation educating the Buddhists to hate Muslims, this re-education could take quite a long time.

'The woman' (she no longer deserves the honorific title 'The Lady' is supported by the Burmans. When I lived in Yangon, I found zero support for her from all of the other ethnic and religious groups (Muslim and Christian, Shan, Kachin, Kayin etc).

Posted by Simon Luttrell on May 30, 2015 10:24

gravatar

With all respect, mr. Editor. A president of a nation is president of all people living in that nation.
This lady felt from her 'Nobel-platform'. More and more she becomes international isolated as I read in your article,.. not invited to the Norway Conference, the Dalai Lama has given press conferences, criticizing the lady 'gently'. ( is actually killing her reputation). A President of a nation can not function if not having international respect. She has not any longer international respect.

Posted by Kurt on May 30, 2015 10:50

Editor Comment:

She is not a president and unlikely to become one.

gravatar

Hi Simon Luttrell

You have made some very interesting comments on this site.

I note that you previously said that you had been a school teacher and a school principal in Burma. You said that you had to protect the Muslim kids' lunch boxes from being " contaminated" by the Buddhist kids. Can you explain what you meant by that please?

By the way, I certainly agree that it would require an enormous amount of time and effort to counter the brainwashing of many Burmans over many decades.

Unfortunately, there have been events in history where a brainwashed population only saw clearly after it suffered the humiliation if losing a war. Fortunately, there are other times when bad social attitudes have slowly improved without undue violence.

Ian Yarwood
Solicitor - Perth, Australia

Posted by Ian Yarwood on May 30, 2015 11:13

gravatar

[quote]
You said that you had to protect the Muslim kids' lunch boxes from being " contaminated" by the Buddhist kids. Can you explain what you meant by that please?
[/quote]

In the morning, my class of 7-8 year olds would be dropped off by their parents, walk up to class, and leave their lunchboxes with their lunch in the classroom, whilst they played outside before the first lesson.

I discovered that some of the Buddhist kids were opening the lunch-boxes of the 2 Muslim students and dropping pieces of pork into their boxes.

IMHO, this was not something that they thought up on their own. These kids were only 7 or 8 years old, and it was their middle-class parents who had put them up to this.

Later on, at Parents' Evening, I was horrified at the racist attitude towards Muslims from seemingly-educated, Buddhist parents. (Their discrimination was against ALL Muslims in Myanmar, not just the Rohingya).

They did pass racist comments about the Christian minority kids (Kachin), and they seemed not prejudice against minority ethnic groups, (Shan etc). It was purely an anti-Muslim prejudice.

My lodgings were in the poorer area of Yangon, on the narrow streets behind Sule Pagoda, (generally a Muslim community).

I worked in Yangon for about 18 months and couldn't fathom out why there was an almost total prejudice by the Bhuddist majority against the Muslim minority. This prejudice was exhibited by both poor and rich Buddhists, educated and illiterate.

Posted by Simon Luttrell on May 30, 2015 14:33

gravatar

@Simon Luttrell

Thanks Simon for that clarification about the lunch boxes. I think it is always useful to have the observations of people with first-hand knowledge.

In a comment published on this site about a week ago you stated there was no prejudice towards the Christians. Did you make a typo today in your answer to me?

You would be aware of course that the Burmese Army has been well known for atrocities committed against hill tribe people near the Thai border. Some of the hill tribe people are Christian.

An interesting aspect of that persecution is that the Burmans came to that region after the hill tribe people, so I have been told by David Eubank.

The educated Burmans might hate the Muslims but then there were many educated Germans who sided with the Nazis against the Jews.

The Nazis persecution of the Jews occurred in stages.

It also seems that the persecution of the Rohingya had progressed in a series of steps: Cancellation of citizenship, increased violence, destruction of homes and businesses, increased hate speech, increased propaganda, lack of free press, creation of a ghetto.

Thanks again Simon.

Cheers
Ian

Posted by Ian Yarwood on May 30, 2015 16:27

gravatar

[quote]
Did you make a typo today in your answer to me?
[/quote]
Sorry Ian, yes I did. I meant to say that there was NO prejudice or discrimnination by the Buddhist parents towards the Kachin Christians in my class (2 children). Some of the Myanmar teachers were Christian and this also didn't cause any issues for these Buddhist parents.

My conclusion from living and working in Yangon was that the entire Buddhist population had been 'brainwashed' over a generation to hate Muslims.

It was very strange - and sad - to listen to educated Myanmar adults spouting such racism.

Posted by Simon Luttrell on May 30, 2015 19:42

gravatar

Hi Simon

It did seem like a typo. Thanks for clarifying.

Apparently the Burmans are not very happy with the international media or the UN either. Do they get much independent news and information? Are certain websites blocked?

I see that the racist monk Wirathu is very active on Facebook and that he produces DVDs that are widely distributed.

Posted by Ian Yarwood on May 30, 2015 22:43


Saturday April 20, 2024
Horizon Karon Beach Resort & Spa

FOLLOW PHUKETWAN

Facebook Twitter