Tourism News

Tourism News Phuketwan Tourism News
facebook recommendations

NEWS ALERTS

Sign up now for our News Alert emails and the latest breaking news plus new features.

Click to subscribe

Existing subscribers can unsubscribe here

RSS FEEDS

A vendor and her fans at Kamala beach. The new rules are being sorted

'90 Percent There' on Future of Phuket Beaches, Says Governor

Thursday, August 27, 2015
PHUKET: Beachgoers will be able to bring their own umbrellas and chairs to ''10 percent zones'' under a new set of proposals revealed today to end the discord over what should happen next on Phuket's beaches.

Researchers from Phuket's Prince of Songkhla University have suggested the establishment of an island beach committee to oversee standards at all beaches and ensure the regulation and protection of the natural icons.

Vendors at today's Phuket Provincial Hall meeting were not happy to hear the recommendation that all commercial activities should be barred.

But the seven months of research was independent and the cost was met by the university, without so much as a single telephone call being made by the governor to seek an outcome, a university spokesperson said.

While the university's comprehensive proposals have yet to be endorsed, Phuket Governor Nisit Jansomwong said authorities were ''90 percent there'' in finding a way forward on the beaches.

Bearing in mind that 20 years of law-breaking and environmental abuse has to be corrected, the governor appears to be taking the right approach.

''We can't make any hasty decision just to suit circumstances,'' he told Phuketwan after the meeting. ''We need to get this right, and that may take a little longer.''

Today's gathering brought the governor, all three vice governors, three district chiefs, the Royal Thai Navy, senior police and local council representatives together, along with an audience of beach vendor stakeholders.

A university spokesperson said their were ''extreme differences'' between what tourists wanted and what the beach vendors wanted.

Though the spokesperson did not say so, this is no surprise given the way that laws have gone unenforced on the beaches for two decades.

All proposals had to be legal, sustainable, and in the best interests of the beaches, the research summary said.

In terms of interviews, 75 percent of tourists in the survey were Europeans and 25 percent Asians, an approach that reflected the levels of interest of the respective groups.

Researchers interviewed 470 arriving tourists and the same number of departing tourists, beach business stakeholders, officials and law enforcers, hotel managers and 420 Thai people who use the beaches, along with vice governors, mayors, police superintendents and senior council officials.

There was a huge difference, researchers said, between the majority of people surveyed, who were content with a 10 percent zone for services, and the vendors who wanted a much greater area opened up for sales.

Of the tourists questioned on arrival, 54 percent expected to find clean beaches; 27 percent expected a natural environment; 14 percent expected snacks and other services; and 3.5 percent sought jet-ski rides and other activities.

Outward bound tourists said Phuket;'s beaches were clean but not as clean as expected. Satisfaction levels were down on expectations.

One point was up, though - safety. The vast majority gave a big tick to ''safety'' despite concerns that a military presence might indicate Phuket was less safe.

In summary, the research team recommended:

.. all proposals have to follow the law;

.. an independent beach management committee should be set up, funded by local government, with representatives from 12 organisations ncluding a vice governor, district chiefs, mayors, police superintendents, senior officials, community leaders, and academics;

.. all people earning money on or near the beaches should form cooperatives;

.. local people unconnected with tourism needed a voice;

.. hotel managers connected to tourism also should have a say.

The Phuket beach committee would essentially follow international standards adapted to Phuket's specific needs, with mobile patrols aimed at making sure rules were enforced. The committee would support and protect the environment and ensure the proper collection and disposal of both offshore and onshore garbage.

No beach services would be permitted on any beach, the researchers suggested, unless the committee felt it was necessary - and if it was necessary, the area involved would be no more than 10 percent.

If services are permitted, the people who are engaged to work should be real local people and the ''mafia'' big guys should be kept out.

Every operation must be carried out by a cooperative.

Ideas for money-making on beaches should be considered, including pre-wedding photography. The aim for new ideas should be ''beach fun.''

Beach chairs will not be permitted except for the aged and the disabled in designated areas. People are free to bring their own equipment for use at those beaches where there are designated areas.

No food, cigarettes and alcohol will be permitted to be sold at beaches.

Provision for sales of snacks and soft drinks will be made along the shorefronts as designated by the committee, provided the constructions do not interfere with beach vistas.

Jet-skis, banana boats and parasailers will be controlled in zones, with a cap on existing numbers.

The committee will have the responsibility for explaining to tourists how the rules and regulations work.

While the governor said the future of the beaches of Phuket was ''90 percent there,'' the big issue remains funding for the committee. Local councils, which presently control the beaches, say that finding a budget for a beach committee would be difficult.

The only mayor at today's meeting was Patong's Chalermlak Kebsub, who has previously said that it was not possible to enforce rules on the beach.

She has the added difficulty of needing to win the votes of a council dominated by members who do not support her.

Governor Nisit congratulated the university researchers on providing potential solutions, not just the set of statistics that he had expected.

Comments

Comments have been disabled for this article.

gravatar

Sounds like a good report and pretty fair to all sides

Interesting statistic that 3.5% of tourists want jetskis and other activities, if that was written as 96.5% do NOT want jetskis and other activities that would send a very different message.

Posted by Discover Thainess on August 27, 2015 21:39

gravatar

I suppose the same situation exists for exams. If you are in the bottom 10% you are almost there in reaching the top 90%.

Posted by MoW on August 27, 2015 21:52

gravatar

90% there eh Gov.
Isn't that the same proportion of beach left in the hands of the Jet ski's boys?

Posted by Hugh Jarse on August 27, 2015 21:54

gravatar

The study contradicts itself in all the major points of complaints by tourists.

You can't have it both ways. Either illegal activities are banned or not but the study, for some inexplicable reason, attempts this anyway.

All proposals had to be legal
All proposals have to follow the law



all people earning money on or near the beaches should form cooperatives

No beach services would be permitted on any beach, unless the committee felt it was necessary

Jet-skis, banana boats and parasailers will be controlled in zones

Posted by Herbert on August 27, 2015 23:04

gravatar

jet-ski are not commercial activities,how many % of the baech for jet -ski mafia

Posted by nova on August 27, 2015 23:45

gravatar

Typical compromise, or fudge.
Still trying to please everyone and in the process pleasing no one.

Posted by Sir Burr on August 28, 2015 07:12

gravatar

Any let up in enforcement will see the old problems return very fast. There should be no commercial business on public land or beaches. It aint rocket science.

Posted by Arun Murugaa on August 28, 2015 09:25

gravatar

This isn't going to bring back the many tourists that stated they won't return unless the sunbeds return.

Posted by Steve on August 28, 2015 12:32

gravatar

Where were the questions.

Who is behind the power and influence of the jet-skis?

What percentage of those asked want to do as they please on the beach?

What do visitors think of the beach being divided into zones?

Why is the beach dominated by jet skis and parasailing?

What right does a commercial operator have to tell me where to sit or what to do on public land?

Posted by gee on August 28, 2015 13:01

gravatar

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah....

"Of the tourists questioned on arrival, 3.5% sought jet-ski rides and other activities"....

"Jet-skis, banana boats and parasailers will be controlled in zones with a cap on existing numbers"....

Huh? Am I missing something here? What's to be "controlled"? The survey clearly states that 96.5% of tourists surveyed did not seek "jet rides and other activities." Get rid of them! They should no longer even enter into the equation! Nobody wants them!

Posted by Paradise on August 28, 2015 14:16

gravatar

This is telling me only that it will give another struggling situation in high season regarding beach standards and service. Okay they do not want so see the signs, so take the outcome of it. Good luck and business with all your future chinese tourists because at the end that's all what will be left there

Posted by fred on August 28, 2015 15:55

Editor Comment:

fred, this is not about the money but about the beaches and the future. Only caring about the money is what has brought Phuket to this point.

gravatar

At the end of the day people are now going to Vietnam instead

Posted by kano on August 28, 2015 16:39

Editor Comment:

Really? Some may be doing that. But not that many.

gravatar

"the establishment of an island beach committee"

What an excellent idea. Why didn't you think of that, Ed?

;)

Posted by Smithy on August 28, 2015 23:27


Thursday April 25, 2024
Horizon Karon Beach Resort & Spa

FOLLOW PHUKETWAN

Facebook Twitter